Go Free Credit         gofreecredit         Privacy Matters 1-2-3

Creditinfocenter Blog header image 2

The best of viagra uk delivery sildenafil 50mg is cool pills

PayDay Loans Rejected by Arizona Voters

November 14th, 2008 · 8 Comments · Banking, Consumer Debt, PayDay Loans

Cindy

by Cindy

A clear message was sent to payday lenders last week by voters in Arizona, which rejected Proposition 200 by a 3 to 2 margin.  And the payday lenders are most certainly unhappy campers, after spending more than 14.6 million in one of the most expensive advertising campaigns in Arizona’s history.

The ballot proposition that was backed by the payday lending industry was misleading in that to the unsuspecting, it might “appear to reform” unethical payday practices. But the voting public was not fooled: neither were consumer advocates, community groups, business leaders, and military and public servants. Bravo, Arizona! The editor of this site, Kristy Welsh, spent considerable time informing friends and people she met on the street what the bill was really about. (Did it have any effect? She likes to think so.)

Prior to 2000, there were less than 10 payday loan stores in Arizona, and the maximum amount of interest on a consumer loan was 36%. At current there are more payday loan stores than McDonald’s and Starbucks combined (770 and counting), and the average APR for a payday loan is 400%.

Currently fifteen states as well as Washington DC effectively ban payday loans utilizing strict consumer loan interest rate caps of (most typically) 36%. The failure of proposition 200 means the existing law in Arizona will be retained, subjecting payday lenders to the same regulation as all other lenders in the state of Arizona after 2010: an interest rate cap of 36%.

The failure of the payday industry to “pull the wool” over the eyes of the public and community leaders shows that the citizens of Arizona favor a crack-down on irresponsible lending practices, and will not tolerate the deceptive marketing practices and outrageous fee charged by payday lenders. These ballot victories send a message to policymakers everywhere: The 36 percent interest-rate cap that’s good for citizens in 15-plus states and for military families nationwide makes sense for citizens across the country.

Related posts:

  1. Half of Repeat Payday Loans Opened Immediately or After 24 Hour Wait Another blog post to further along our campaign against the...
  2. Direct Deposit Advance Loans – Aren’t They Payday Loans? Regional banks U.S. Bancorp and Wells Fargo & Co. offer...
  3. Refund Anticipation Loans: Can You Say “Predatory Lending” If you’ve never heard of a “Refund anticipation loan”, or...
  4. Be Careful When Applying For Private Student Loans Having a good education is more important than ever in...
  5. Phony Debt Collector Scam Alert Issued by BBB Last month, The Better Business Bureau (BBB) issued a national alert warning...

Tags: ······

8 Comments so far ↓

  • payday loans

    It is a shame that some states are banning payday lenders. They have helped out many people when in a bind.

  • payday loans

    no one is more open about their rates, by law payday lenders have to disclose way more than any other lending agency.

  • Kristy

    I can’t imagine that anyone has been helped by payday lenders, except the payday lenders themselves.

  • David Higuera

    Thank you for this post, Cindy. And to Kristy and everyone else out there who volunteered your time to educate your friends and colleagues about Prop 200, Bravo! and Thank you!

    Cindy is exactly right. Arizonans sent a VERY CLEAR message in this election: 400 percent interest rates are UNACCEPTABLE. We must ensure that the 36% cap comes back into effect in 2010 as planned.

    Keep your eye on our site for more updates as the legislative session begins…

    http://www.200isNoReform.com

    Thank you,
    David Higuera
    Arizonans for Responsible Lending

  • Faxless Payday Loans

    Why do the people against payday lending not get it? An APR of 400% is amazingly high but it is NOT applicable. The Loans are SHORT TERM. If you have a loan out for 2 weeks, the say they are intended, the interest you pay is 16% (417% APR) only. If that rate is cut to 10 times less the lenders make 1.6 or 1.60 per hundred per 2 weeks. Of course the industry will have to shut down. Instead of just looking at numbers do a little research. If something works out great for parties A and B why should C come in and say this can’t happen?

  • Emily Winkle

    Hi, I’m Emily and I work with Check ‘n Go. And part of my job is to see what conversation is taking place about the payday loan industry. If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to ask, or visit checkngo dot com.

  • Kristy

    Faxless, though the loans are SHORT TERM, during that SHORT TERM, they are still 400%.

    Not buying into it.

  • anon

    I work at a payday loan place, trust me all we do is screw people over. We are encouraged to get people to borrow more… say their limit is 260 and they only want 200 .. we encourage them to take the other 60 so there is more interest. honestly its a huge huge huge screw over for the people using these. I hope I find a new job soon , because I absolutely hate what Im doing for and to these people.

Leave a Comment