<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Multiple Credit Report Item Dispute &#8211; One Letter or Separate for Each?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.creditinfocenter.com/wordpress/2009/07/30/multiple-credit-report-item-dispute-one-letter-or-separate-for-each/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.creditinfocenter.com/wordpress/2009/07/30/multiple-credit-report-item-dispute-one-letter-or-separate-for-each/</link>
	<description>For the Up To Date News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:26:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt-Schubert</title>
		<link>http://www.creditinfocenter.com/wordpress/2009/07/30/multiple-credit-report-item-dispute-one-letter-or-separate-for-each/comment-page-1/#comment-2421</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt-Schubert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 23:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditinfocenter.com/wordpress/?p=2730#comment-2421</guid>
		<description>Hey, ok, I get it, I guess - but does this really work?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, ok, I get it, I guess &#8211; but does this really work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giovanni</title>
		<link>http://www.creditinfocenter.com/wordpress/2009/07/30/multiple-credit-report-item-dispute-one-letter-or-separate-for-each/comment-page-1/#comment-2376</link>
		<dc:creator>Giovanni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 02:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.creditinfocenter.com/wordpress/?p=2730#comment-2376</guid>
		<description>This could not be any more simple and true. Send as many disputes as you see fit and state your dispute reason. Disputing the same account for the same reason will not get you different results, its like asking the same question everytime and expecting a different answer. However, I have found that sending disputes to two different address for one bureau (local &amp; the standard) you have two different offices working on the same consumer and you will get different results. Then, swap the disputes from those two addresses and the response will also be different, most of the time it is an update or deletion this is mostly true for transunion for some reason. To me, it appears that they just don&#039;t verify anything.  The one think I would like Kristy to comment on is, OCR and the details of its functionality. It seems that there might be a way to use it in our favor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This could not be any more simple and true. Send as many disputes as you see fit and state your dispute reason. Disputing the same account for the same reason will not get you different results, its like asking the same question everytime and expecting a different answer. However, I have found that sending disputes to two different address for one bureau (local &amp; the standard) you have two different offices working on the same consumer and you will get different results. Then, swap the disputes from those two addresses and the response will also be different, most of the time it is an update or deletion this is mostly true for transunion for some reason. To me, it appears that they just don&#8217;t verify anything.  The one think I would like Kristy to comment on is, OCR and the details of its functionality. It seems that there might be a way to use it in our favor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

