Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 06/03/2020 in all areas

  1. 1 point
    IMO it was the original attorneys wanting to get a dismissal, and going about it strangely, and then PRA having a change of strategy once the current lead attorney was assigned to the case. Which is what I argued when I opposed PRA's motion to vacate. In regards to the mixing up of the cases, PRA originally filed their MTD with prejudice January 22, then sent me a MTD with prejudice dated February 10th. So if cases were mixed up, it was done twice, which is why I am hesitant to embrace that line of reasoning.