LD-50

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    101

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

15 Good

About LD-50

  • Rank
    Impressive 100+ postings

Profile Fields

  • Location
    AZ
  1. LD-50
    Good to know, @shellieh98! Thanks...
  2. LD-50
    So this is all wrapped up. Per my attorney, Midland/Kaplan was being very stingy about the case in terms of paying me my $1k plus attorney fees. And, I kind of feared them making a point and taking me to court again for giving them a hard time about their stupid mistake. So, what we DID get them to agree to is signing an agreement stating they will remove it from all credit reports, never report it again and never sue me again. Additionally, this is not debt forgiveness because if it were, they'd submit tax forms end of year based on the balance forgiven so that was included in the contract my attorney wrote up. I have signed it and am awaiting my countersigned copy. He said he had to forfeit some of his fees to get this deal. Could I have contacted a different attorney and got my $1k? Probably. But I'm satisfied with receiving nothing monetary but rather the closure that, legally, I should never hear from these bozos again! YIP YIP YIP YEE HAW!!!! Thanks so much for your support through this colossal pain in the pants! I really do hope its over. I could not have got through this on the upside without the support and resources of this forum/website and am truly grateful!
  3. LD-50
    I asked the attorney for an update today. Its what he expected. I'm remain hopeful! "The law firm asked for an extension and an initial demand, but has not responded to me other than that. Very slow progress to start"
  4. LD-50
    The attorney filed the federal suit and said I'd likely receive payment within 90 days. He said he'd let me know when he hears back but that they routinely ask for extensions which he is obligated to give...but still expected them to settle within 90 days. More when I hear....
  5. LD-50
    My letter was a little different. It did have a date and the verbiage after that was also different.
  6. LD-50
    @Az Piano Lady 14 - please link your thread here so I can take a look. But, my letter did have a date on it - the date that Craig had a judgement entered against him. However, there is no Craig. I talked to an attorney today who is taking my case. I just signed his fee agreement where I pay nothing, they will pay me $1k plus his court/attorney fees. I'm excited about this! I'm waiting to hear back if we can also ask that they be prevented from ever suing me on this matter again and if we can ask that they remove it from all credit reports.
  7. LD-50
    I contacted an attorney and he is waiting for me to send him scanned copies of the dismissal, judgement and letter. The judgement is in Craig's name only (I know no one by that name and returned all mail addressed to Craig only unopened). The letter, I believe but will confirm once I get home, is address to both me and Craig. I would love to make these jerks pay me!! I'll provide updates as I have them.
  8. LD-50
    OH! Good to know...TY!
  9. LD-50
    Awesome...and DONE!!!!! Just found an attorney and sent them a detailed email. WOOT!!!! I love this forum sofa king much. THANK YOU!
  10. LD-50
    I should already have said this before but I know a judgement has not been entered against me.
  11. LD-50
    This sounds great but I don't even know where to start. So much has changed for me in the last year. Now I'm a single mom with little to zero free time to research this sort of thing. Last year I was all over this forum finding and getting what I needed to prepare for my case. Can someone please point me to an article or thread here that would help me in filing this type of suit? It may take more energy than I have to spend but $1k sure sounds good about now and worth the effort!
  12. LD-50 started following Midland Suing Me in Arizona - My Answer
  13. LD-50
    I'm the OP of this thread. My case was dismissed almost a year ago because Kaplan Law didn't show up to mediation twice. Last week I received a letter from Kaplan saying, "As you know a judgement was entered against you on June xx, 2013...bla bla bla...contact us to make payment arrangements...." Do these people think I have amnesia?! I'm trying to decide if I should send them a snarky letter back including a copy of the dismissal and noting, "Really...that's now how I remember it playing out." Or, if I should just leave it alone. Anyone else have this happen to them? What a joke.
  14. LD-50
    Omigosh sorry - no...I was the OP of another one of the same topic sorry. Was subscribed to this one and figured it was mine. Its been a year. My apologies....I'll post on my own. Disregard here.
  15. LD-50
    I'm the OP of this thread. My case was dismissed almost a year ago because Kaplan Law didn't show up to mediation twice. Last week I received a letter from Kaplan saying, "As you know a judgement was entered against you on June xx, 2013...bla bla bla...contact us to make payment arrangements...." Do these people think I have amnesia?! I'm trying to decide if I should send them a snarky letter back including a copy of the dismissal and noting, "Really...that's now how I remember it playing out." Or, if I should just leave it alone. Anyone else have this happen to them? What a joke.
  16. LD-50
    Ok so the short answer is that no, I cannot require the CRA delete items from my report that they did not specifically respond to in 30 days if they respond at all about anything in my letter? Their response, even if only regarding one thing, suffices their required 30 day response? Yes?