Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


browniebrownie141 last won the day on September 22 2014

browniebrownie141 had the most liked content!

Profile Fields

  • Location
    los angeles, california

Recent Profile Visitors

954 profile views

browniebrownie141's Achievements

Impressive 100+ postings

Impressive 100+ postings (5/6)



  1. Today starts my path to file for Appeal... 1. Last night, finished reading APP101/Info- california verson. 2. Form App102- Notice of Appeal, completed. 3. Working on App103-Designating Record on Appeal others.... Please...."Wish Me the Best"...OK !
  2. @oldwoman: FYI, I lost the court trial yesterday, just so that you know. And Good Luck to you. Thanks for dropping by, best wishes ...
  3. Anyone who knows about Transcript Reimbursement Fund ? How do they work in terms of chipping in the court reporter's transcript fee ( need that for appeal ?) million thanks
  4. I just came back from Court Trial. I Lost. I told the Judge I will be filing the Appeal on the spot. There are a few things: 1. JDB's witness showed up at trial, although I tried as hard as i could to attack, even brought up People Vs. Dorsey 1974 appeal case law. No use. 2. The JDB attorney provided a big folder, looks nice, but inside I found there was 1 piece- Affidavit hiding, but I caught it, brought that up to Judge, got that kicked out because it was not listed in CCP 96 reply from plaintiff. Judge precluded that piece OUT, but at the end, not good enough. 3. I could not help from thinking, did the Judge errored on the issue of Lack of privity/ broken privity. As I repeated brought it up. But does NOT seems to interest him? Perhpas I did it in a incorrect way? I kept repeating HSBC Trust 1- to Trust 3- Trust 4 and how JDB do not have those document= broken chain of custody of document(s); = broken privity. Like I mentioned, I am emotionally prepared. Rocha, Rogers had to file appeal. Just of my head, I have 15 days to file my appeal, right ? I will be focusing on the Issue of how JDB witness should be unqualified based on People Vs. Dorsey 1974. And Lack of / Broken Privity. If anyone can brain storm Me other these 2 reason(s), please...... Million thanks
  5. Dear easy619: I have been faithfully following yr case, and clearly, would like to give you all the emotional support that I can. Looking at the Target Vs. Rocha, and CACH Vs. Rogers, both were lost but they filed the appeal, and got verdict reversed. It seems to me, that's part of the path. My trial is coming up real soon, and I mean it. Surprisingly, JDB did not filed a CCP 98, nor send me one. But they responded my CCP 96. So, as you can see, I am preparing for verbal agrument/ live trial. You are way ahead of me, and I must say, hang-in-there, stay tough. That's what it takes, .... Rememer this : You Are Beautiful !
  6. the reason why I asked (in the posting#311), is that this ESQ most likely will be the one representing the JDB at court trial, as she appeared some other cases just recently been done. so,please, anyone, who has info about/ past experience with this ESQ, please let me know....
  7. @Anon Amos, @calawyer, Gentlemen/ Ladies: background check pls...need info/ any experience encountered with this ESQ/attorney ?? Lorette Kohn Levun (attorney lic# 80279) 1742 flowerdale street, simi valley, ca 93063 admitted to State Bar: since 6/23/1978 million thanks
  8. May be just a little off track....Did you receive any 1099 which related with tax filing, from Chase, which reflected the alleged account named in the lawsuit? There has been a situation that chase issued 1099 instead, then they filed with IRS for a full tax related credit or some sort. If it is yr case, then, showing the 1099 may be helpful to you. And since, it is a JDB= junk debt buyer. In order for them to successfully win the case, one must have legal standing, and must have "complete chain of custody of document" relating to all sale transfer(s). I am sure other Members will jump in to help you. Check to see if you fit in any "Affirmative defense(s)" in addition to just general denial. Also check to see if you would qualifed for fee-waiver-( covers filing fee at court) Most of the court do have a website so that later on you can check the status of yr case summaries, especially what plaintiff had filed on yr case. You must "answer" the the complaint now that they served you, so that it won't be a Default Judgement against you.
  9. @Anon Amos, @calawyer AND other Ladies & Gentlemen: Do I need to name their witnesses on my witnesses list IN ORDER TO cross exam them ? And once again, is that the usual "declaration" --"under prejury under that state of calfornia...all foregoing statement/ evidence are true and correct "is good enough for a witness/evidence list declaration ?? Thanks
  10. @Calawyer: Ok...I got your PM. @Anon Amos, and All other Ladies & Gentlemen here: Now, I have a list of evidence(s) that I would like to bring to Court trial. JDB/ Attorney DID NOT send me CCP 96. And what exactly do I need to write on Declaration to make it GOOD ? Description of document(s) to be produced at trial: Defendant’s Discovery Request(s) AND Plaintiff’s Discovery Replies. Defendant’s Amended Discovery reply to Plaintiff’s Discovery Request. Letter from HSBC, indicating that Defendant had another account with HSBC but closed due to inactivity/ no amount was owed. Letter sent from defendant to Capital One and mailing details, as HSBC Bank Neveda/ card services was acquired by Capital One, asking for confirmation. Letter from Capital One to defendant, confirming account information. Letter from Credit rating agency indicating the disputed account /account activity were removed from defendant’s credit report after receipt the disputing request and evidence(s) from defendant. NY Times newspaper /online reported that HSBC card service was acquired by Capital One. Defendant reserves the right to call other witnesses and use evidence(s) for impeachment purposes.
  11. @calawyer: Ok I understood the importance of the word "INTEND" was missing, although they did'nt use the word "MAY". -they did provided address, but they did not indicated it's JDB attorney office. ....checked internet, it's either another attorney office or guarrany bank or PC store...etc. But I also notice, from this forum, JDB have been using this & 2nd san diego address....it just they DID NOT states it's JDB address. -as they DID NOT announce themselves as JDB counsel office address, but rather, just a plain address looks they can be reached there. Do you really think it serves any good by writing this letter in the middle of this ? so say they come back and stated witness #2 and ME are intended to call, then,...?? Here is what I think/ guess.....(1) they would bring a live witness to trial; or (2) somehow along the way, they knew they forgot the CCP98 deadline, they perhaps will try to submit a no-good CCP98 later --betting that I would not know the deadline. Should I send them a letter?.... indicating that their CCP98 deadline had passed, & on the record, i did not received any CCP98 from them. Or the letter carry you message and my above ?? Looking at the sample letter below: CCP 96 requires Plaintiff to list 1) the names and addresses of 2) the witnesses it intends to call at trial. Plaintiff has done neither. Instead it has listed the names of 5 witnesses it may call at trial. Nor has it provided addresses. Instead it has given the address of plaintiff's counsel. Plaintiff's failure to identify the witnesses it intends to call at trial (or provide true addresses), has hampered Defendant's ability to prepare for trial. Please take notice that Defendant intends to object if Plaintiff attempts to call any of these witnesses at trial. XXOO
  12. @calawyer, @Anon Amos : No I HAVE NOT RECEIEVD plaintiff's Declaration in Lieu of Testimony. Non of the document I received has an heading/ description like that. This is 1 reason why, I asked earlier, upon showing to you all with the document-- I asked: is this REPLY to my CCP 96 Or is it their CCP98. I know, their deadline for sending me CCP 98 had passed. As I mentioned, last night I did some searching, and Yes, I have been preparing to "Live-trial "preparation. I have been reading and got on Court-call, listening to " court in session"....trying to get myself NO FEAR, now I am quite comfortable with court environment. I even went to sit in at downtown Los Angeles Federal Court and Superior Court to see/ hear different people court cases in session. Refering to your earlier comment: ( they DID NOT used the word INTEND, but they also DID NOT use the word MAY ) Posting #284 my photos of document Page 1 / line #18/19 : it's "Witnesses to be called at trial" And ................................................................./ line #22/23 : In the event Myrell Johns (listed as #2 witness; they listed ME as #1 witness) becomes unavailable for trial, plaintiff will call another of its custodian of records... Confirm to KICK them on this ? Million thanks You have Millions Millions of writing.....the heading I will be searching under yr user name & ccp96, right ? Meanwhile, I finalise my trial brief and others,...
  13. @Anon Amos, @calawyer, & others refering to posting #290: 1. The causes of action is both open book & account stated. I saw from somewhere, durinf cross examination, if JDB's witness cannot fully accounted for all accounting details, they could ONLY get the portion of the $$ they could "account for" IF they win the case. I guess I would prepare for questioning. But is it a GROUND for MIL ? 2. How about "Objections to Plaintiff's CCP 96 Reply" as they prepared 2 days late ( from their own attorney signature/ date & their proof of service signature also October 22nd. ( 2 days pass the October 20) --Anon Amos thinks it's timely! 3. "they have not properly identified the witness as the code requires"/ how they NOT comply with CCP 98, Detail Please ! 4. Should I "Objections to ALL their witness's Declaration in Lieu of Testimony, just in case if they try something funny later? Just to have my "Objections to their CCP 98 on the record ? 5. Should I also go aheag to Subpoena one of the witness ANYWAY, just to cover my base?? ( I read, You BOTH ALREADY TOLD ME, )...but still... 6. I further check online, turns out many of JDB's cases, also using a San Diego County address, 138 miles away from the Trial court-North of Los Angeles County. Million thanks
  14. @calawyer, @Anon Amos: If this is their REPLY to my CCP 96, then....NO, I have NOT received their CCP 98 Declaration in Lieu of Testimony. ( And Anon Amos points it out, deadline for ccp98 is 30 days prior trial ( + 5 mailing = 25 days) .....already passed deadline.
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.