pampamk

Members
  • Content Count

    186
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

pampamk last won the day on February 21 2015

pampamk had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

51 Excellent

About pampamk

  • Rank
    Impressive 100+ postings

Profile Fields

  • Location
    Kansas

Recent Profile Visitors

334 profile views
  1. I can't for the life of me figure out this judge.... I finally, today, received the journal entry from the district court reversing its ruling against me and entering judgment in my favor However, it made no mention of the costs assessed against plaintiff to be paid to me, which were included in the mandate from the Appeallte Court. Maybe I'm wrong... but I am thinking the journal entry should include the amount, no??? What is your opinion?
  2. I love that we can now view the unpublished KS appellate and Supreme court decisions also. It is a new feature, I didn't have it available to me as I did my research. @debtzapper @shellieh98 mine wouldn't be too hard to find...
  3. LOVE IT! That is my sentinment as well... as we continuue to pick away at the courts and their complete disregard for the pro se and/or their mindset that all people being sued for debt deserve it, as well as the cronyism to outright illegal activities between the courts and the JBD's we will all be winners in the long run!
  4. Hey All!! Sorry not ignoring you, there just is not enough time in the day to get everything done... I haven't any new updates.... at a stand still, so it seems to be with any thing judicial... @shellieh98 and @debtzapper I would love to post it but have been advised to wait until all my "things" are over, hope you understand. I personally cannot wait for the day to post for all to see! I can't remember if I said this on here, but as I spoke with one attorney he stated he was surprised it wasn't published vs unpublished. I agreed and said I guess the courts didn't think it as important as I. He stated oh they do, they just didn't want to subject the attorney I defeated to the ridicule from his/her peers for being beat at the appellate level by a pro se... I despise the cronyism amongst the courts at all levels and if my case does nothing more than bring that to the forefront it will be a win for us all!
  5. @BV80 Yes, I plan on recording them, I've got to remember how to work that little device, lol. I checked laws several years ago, I guess I better check again just to make sure. No they haven't called my cell, just home as of yet...
  6. I started a new job (in my third week) and with trying to adjust to it I haven't been doing much else, it is much more mentally challenging than my last. So I haven't any updates as far as my case against them. The attorney I spoke with was not lead counsel on the $83 mil case and forwarded my case on to lead. They contacted and unfortunately they are not licensed in KS, but said they have a relationship with a firm in KS with whom they collaborate and had forwarded my info on to them and they would be contacting me soon. Well, soon has passed in my opinion and I haven't heard from the firm. So I plan on contacting the assisting counsel who is licensed in KS and see if they will take my case, if not the hunt is on again... sigh. However, at the time I spoke with them they did say if the lead in the other case was unable to take it they most definitely would take it or find someone who would. Hope is not lost. Couple of interesting side notes: 1. PRA has started calling... sporadically. They never leave a msg. I answered the last two times and asked for the phone number from which they were calling and the mailing address. They always begin their spiel with a subtle threat of litigation... the first time the caller said my account was being reviewed by their litigation department; the second caller said she was calling from the litigation department. I asked the second caller if she was an attorney, and why she was threatening litigation. She did not like that. Anyway, I think from now on I will answer, let them do their spiel then ask for their name, number and address, say thank you and hang up. I am making a log of every call whether I answer or not. 2. I haven't received anything from the district court so I called them today. The first person I spoke with said nothing had been added to the file since December. I asked had they not received anything from the appellate court. She then said she was going to transfer me to someone who might know more about that. She came back and said she had spoken with the other person and the judges orders will go out in the mail tomorrow... hmmmm wonder why it took me calling to get them to do the right thing... I am so disgusted with the district court system... the law seems to mean nothing to them. Anyway, that is all for now...
  7. I emailed the firm that represented the winning $83 million verdict against PRA in May. They called... they want my case!!!
  8. I just beat PRA at the Appellate Court level as a Pro Se.... http://www.creditinfocenter.com/community/topic/322477-in-need-of-some-direction-served-answered-received-interrogatories/
  9. This is an interesting read.... http://voidjudgements.net/suedc/Toohey-v-Portfolio-Recovery-Associates-RICO.pdf
  10. So I received a reply from the first attorney I emailed. I told him I had prevailed in my appeal with the KS Appellate Court along with the link, and wondered if I might have a claim against them and their minion. He replied: pampamk, I am interested. When can we meet. I just sent an email to the attorneys who handled the case I posted a link to above, which gives me such joy to read... Fingers crossed, I will be interested in hearing what they have to say.
  11. I definitely intend to speak with some attorneys. I am in no way, shape, or form attempting this on my own. I actually emailed one this morning asking his opinion as to whether I had a case or not (haven' received a reply as of yet). I will have to go back through all of my papers and refresh my brain... yikes! i do recall reading that about PRA not meeting the criteria, but I think I came across something countering that as well. I plan to also look into malicious prosecution... This was such a joy to read: http://www.kansascity.com/news/local/article21073359.html I haven't delved into the depths yet but this case makes me think I would have a year from the court of appeals ruling to file for malicious prosecution: http://www.kscourts.org/Cases-and-Opinions/opinions/ctapp/1997/19971010/77418.htm It will most likely be the weekend before I am able to sit down and go through everything, and make some decisions at that time.
  12. This is the quickest way I can find to show you what I am referring to... http://www.creditinfocenter.com/community/topic/307555-the-kansas-consumer-protection-act-kcpa-more-teeth-than-fdcpa/
  13. KS SOL is 3 years. The case was reinstated Aug of 2013, so I'm thinking we are good to go...
  14. I will have to pull my notes and see what all I had written down. I can't recall off the top of my head... I know filing in the wrong venue 3 times, filing past the SOL were the basic. If I remember correctly, at one time I had come up with at least 7 violations, and that was at the start of the case. Now that I know more about the laws, who knows what else will pop up. And lest we forget, KS has a much higher penalty per violation, $10,000 per actually...
  15. Now the fun begins... Being armed with this and the recent decision in the CFPB against the giants PRA and Midland, and a few others, I should have a strong case of my own against them and the little minion who took me to court on their behalf. Hmmmm, I am in need of an attorney full of fire and ready to take them on, I will not be doing this myself, lol. I may have to contact the attorneys I spoke with in the beginning who declined my case... wonder if they might be interested now... tee hee