jcstar

Members
  • Content Count

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About jcstar

  • Rank
    Newbie

Profile Fields

  • Location
    California
  1. Thank you @Anon Amos Sorry about that, the links are back up for anyone with a little available time to review. On the thread you pointed out to me I see a great link to respond to the subpoena, and truth is we have nothing they are asking for, so will answer it. It's crazy the firm suing is Law Office of Kenosian & Miele, LLP, Kenneth J. Miele, Esq. SBN 165730, 8581 Santa Monica Boulevard, No. 17 Los Angeles, CA 90069. putting full info for someone who is in similar situation-and a bit of google search love. It really is for not that much money $2402 and the alleged original dept, if it ever existed, was even half of that, but the point to fight it-is the principle of all this, Citibank, was bailed out billions of dollars by the american people for greed, yet what happens when american citizen falls on hard time at some point in life or experiences bad health for a period, like here, but it's just crazy how things work and how some use laws. I mean how can anyone sue someone that they have never even seen their face, or knows next to nothing about their life's, in any case enough of that, as I'm sure there are hundreds of better comments here about this subject. The response to admissions and the points made are greatly appreciated and will follow advice on this thread as well as others-and will do my best on this long run! SD lawyer, thanks all the best. jc
  2. Thank you, that is a great thread! http://www.creditinfocenter.com/community/topic/317277-how-i-beat-midland-in-california/ No there is no way to edit the title, and I did try to edit before because I knew my title was not very good. In any case if anyone can help me on #6 for admissions. I'm having problem with this one because they did provide a copy of statements on their attachment for proof of Genuineness of Documents. help is appreciated and again thank you for pointing out the threads. jc
  3. I'm new to this form and I believe my post was too broad, and therefore no response. I'm learning as I go, with the terms as well as how to better search the forum. I'll brake this down- Can anyone please review my response to request for admissions (RFA), which I will follow from guidance of this post: http://www.creditinfocenter.com/community/topic/315201-response-to-plaintiffs-1st-set-of-request-for-admissions/ Besides the RFA,'s there is a Request for admission of "Genuineness of Documents" in form DISC-020. 1. Admit to the genuineness (COPIES OF STATEMENTS payment due date 08-08-10) of the documents attached hereto as EXHIBIT 2, monthly billing statements for CITIBANK, NA / CITI CARDS with the Account Number XXXXXXXXXXXX. a. Denied. Defendant has no way of knowing whether the documents attached as EXHIBIT 2 are “genuine”. 2. Admit to the genuineness (COPIES OF STATEMENTS payment due date 09-08-10) of the documents attached hereto as EXHIBIT 2, monthly billing statements for CITIBANK, NA / CITI CARDS with the Account Number XXXXXXXXXXXX. a. Denied. Defendant has no way of knowing whether the documents attached as EXHIBIT 2 are “genuine”. 1. Admit that you applied for a credit card from CITIBANK, NA now bearing account number ###### a. OBJECTION. Lacks foundation. Plaintiff has provided no admissible evidence that defendant “applied” for a credit card from stated creditor bearing the stated account number. 2. Admit that you received a credit card from CITIBANK, NA now bearing account number ##### a. Responding Party lacks sufficient information and belief in order to admit or deny this request and on that basis denies same. 3. Admit that you made payments on CITIBANK, NA credit card now bearing account number #### within the last four years. a. DENIED. On the grounds that after reasonable inquiry the information known or readily obtainable is insufficient to accurately respond to this request. Plaintiff's complaint is utterly devoid of any factual information regarding the alleged debt and any agreement giving rise to the alleged debt. For that reason, defendant has asked plaintiff to respond to a BOP setting forth the contract referred to in the complaint, all charges that were allegedly made pursuant to that contract, and all credits that were made to the account. Without such information, defendant is unable even to identify the debt alleged in the complaint, much less provide the information requested in this request for admissions. Defendant reserves the right to supplement answer to this request for admissions after plaintiff complies with its obligations under the Code. Based upon the foregoing, Defendant responds as follows: DENIED. 4. Admit that you became delinquent in the payments due on the CITIBANK, NA credit card now bearing account number ##### Same as #3 5. Admit that you left a balance due and owing on CITIBANK, NA credit card now bearing account number ####### Same as #3 6. Admit you received statements regarding the CITIBANK, NA credit card now account number ####### ***I'M NOT SURE HOW TO ANSWER THIS ONE*** 7. Admit that the balance due and owed by you on the CITIBANK, NA credit card now bearing account number number ##### as of August 11, 2010 was $###### a. Denied 8. Admit that at all relevant times, Plaintiff has had and now has all rights, title, interest and sole ownership to CITIBANK, NA credit card now bearing account number. a. Responding Party lacks sufficient information and belief in order to admit or deny this request and on that basis denies same. thank you in advance, jc
  4. Hello I'm new to this wonderful place! Here are the facts on this case. 1 Residing in California 2 Lawsuit filed by Kenneth J. Miele, Esq. SNB 165730 Law Office of Kenosian & Miele, LLP Los Angeles, California 90069 Plaintiff White & Whitely Group, LLC, A Limited Liability Company. So Far I have responded to the case of alleged dept-thanks to great information on this very forum. Last I have sent a BOP & sent the follow up request same day (today) receiving following from Plaintiff: SUBP-025 - Notice to consumer or employee SUBp-020 - Request for Admission Plaintiff Request for Production of Documents Copies of a few citicorp statements I need help with the following. I would like to know how I can 1) quash the subpoena 2) or best way to respond to this last actions by Plaintiff. Here are the links for copies of the documents: http://www.developvfl.com/doc1.pdf http://www.developvfl.com/doc2.pdf Your help is greatly appreciated jc