justiceforall3

Members
  • Content Count

    109
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

justiceforall3 last won the day on August 11 2014

justiceforall3 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

9 Neutral

About justiceforall3

  • Rank
    Impressive 100+ postings

Profile Fields

  • Location
    Michigan

Recent Profile Visitors

398 profile views
  1. So after waiting a couple weeks for the attorneys to decide, I was informed today that they are now dismissing the case WITH prejudice!!! I wanted to again thank everyone for their help - especially @Brotherskeeper and @bmc100 - I couldn't have done it without your help!
  2. I received the Plaintiff's stipulation to DISMISS! Unfortunately it is only without prejudice. I feel after this much work I should deserve a dismissal with prejudice. Do I sign? Do I even have another option?
  3. I did talk to him briefly afterwards and he gave me his personal contact information. He seemed too nice, so much that I immediately thought something was strange. I don't trust LVNV and especially their attorneys up to this point, especially the way they sneak around trying to parade their are complying to the court when in reality it is the exact opposite. That is why I made sure to take my 5-10 minutes and hammer down some more points with the Judge. My only relief truly was the Judge and his stance on the whole thing - he finally made some points on my behalf like the statements not sh
  4. So the Judge excused himself right before my case for a 10 minute break. Counsel for the Plaintiff (another new guy I hadn't seen before) was extremely delightful to speak with, and said that he read my entire file and said that I had put up a really good defense. When we got in front of the Judge, Plaintiff admitted that I have denied the account in every answer and affidavit, and agreed that he didn't want this to go to trial (assuming I would win the MSJ?), and asked to adjourn to discuss possibly dismissing the case with LVNV. I was shocked as the Judge hadn't yet even dismissed their mo
  5. So I went to Court this morning to confirm everything that has been filed since the Aug 11 hearing. The Plaintiff has only filed a proof of service document indicating they responded to my Letter to Confer. They have not filed the actual excel spreadsheet, which they mailed to me in a different response, a supplemental response to my Discovery items. They didn't even bother filing a proof of service for that additional response. My question is can the Plaintiff argue documents or bring documents to the Judge that have not been filed with the court, but merely provided in Discovery? If
  6. The excel spreadsheet they had in court didn't appear to have anything redacted or blacked out, but then I only saw it very briefly. They haven't filed anything with the Court showing what they provided to me. The Judge asked them to provide me assignment showing my exact account was assigned to them, he probably just assumed they had the information. The excel spreadsheet doesn't have the portfolio number on it, and my ssn/phone numbers have been blacked out.
  7. As far as I know, they didn't file anything new with the Court, other than the proof of service for their answer to my Letter to Confer, so no they didn't file their redacted excel file. I will confirm with the Court next week.
  8. So I did get another response from LVNV on Tuesday. It was a supplement to their original response to my discovery requests, not a supplement to their response to my letter to confer. They got it to me over a week late. Here is what it says: Pursuant to M.C.R. 2.302,2.309, and 2.310, Plaintiff, LVNV Funding LLC, hereby submits the following responses and objections to Defendant's Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents. 1. Please provide copies of all statements generated while this alleged account was opened with Plaintiff. ANSWER: Plaintiff attached to its initial re
  9. Yeah I felt weird about putting that info in my answer. I will edit. So if I understand correctly, I will have my 3rd amended answer, with my 2nd amended affidavit denying the Plaintiff's account stated, and then an additional affidavit as a supplement. It is starting to come together for me. I will try and post this all soon, as I would like to file by Friday with the long weekend coming up. And to answer your last question, no I didn't get anything from JDB yesterday in the mail.
  10. So it is ok if I mention documents submitted in Plaintiff's motion in my answer to their complaint? Any update on the supplemental affidavit? Here is another shot at the answer... THIRD AMENDED ANSWER TO COMPLAINT On August 11, 2014. at Plaintiff's motion hearing for summary disposition, this Honorable Court ordered Plaintiff to produce documents in response to Defendant's discovery requests by August 25, 2014. After such time, this Court gave leave for Defendant to amend his answer and affidavit. NOW COMES, Defendant Pro Se, Justiceforall3 and states unto this Honorable C
  11. So I just confirmed with the court, the only thing filed since the hearing 2 weeks ago was Plaintiff's proof of service for their response and objections to my Letter to Confer. The court clerk said they don't issue written orders unless they were requested by a party through a motion, so that's why there is no documented order from the Judge for the production of documents.
  12. The declaration of account transfer was not notarized or sworn in at all. I did not receive anything from the court showing that the Judge actually ordered them to comply (in writing), I will check tomorrow with the clerk to see if anything was filed. I have the letter envelope date stamped for Aug 14th.
  13. DEFENDANT'S SECOND AMMENDED AFFIDAVIT DENYING PLAINTIFF'S ACCOUNT STATED CLAIM NOW COMES Defendant in Pro Per, Justiceforall3, whose residence is 123 My Street, My Street, MI 48XXX, certifies and says the following: 1. I am a resident of the State of Michigan, Oakland County, and I am a competent person over 18 years of age. This affidavit is voluntarily made on my personal knowledge and, if sworn as a witness, I can testify competently to the facts in this affidavit. 2. I deny opening an account with the Plaintiff or its alleged assignor. 3. I deny that I am in possession of the "Agree
  14. First run at my 3rd amended answer and affidavit... THIRD AMENDED ANSWER TO COMPLAINT On August 11, 2014. at Plaintiff's motion hearing for summary disposition, this Honorable Court ordered Plaintiff to produce documents in response to Defendant's discovery requests by August 25, 2014. After such time, this Court gave leave for Defendant to amend his answer and affidavit. NOW COMES, Defendant Pro Se, Justiceforall3 and states unto this Honorable Court as follows: JURISDICTIONAL ALLEGATIONS 1. Answering paragraph 1, the Defendant denies the allegations cont