• Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral


  • Rank

Profile Fields

  • Location

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Back in May I went to my hearing and met with a lawyer from Hunt & Henriques and agreed upon a settlement out in the hall, before the hearing began. I've made the first two payments and now I just received in the mail a NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR ORDER SETTING ASIDE AND VACATING DISMISSAL, POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT OF MOTION, Below is the case summary: Histories (Dates listed in descending order) 07/26/2017 NOTICE OF MOTION FOR ORDER SETTING ASIDE AND VACATING DISMISSAL , DECLARATION, AND POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT THEREOF FILED. RECEIPT # 11707xxxxxx . M
  2. I was finally able to go and get a copy of the Proof of Service. It's a complete lie. It states I was personally served "Julio Ascorra" and the time and date which I was allegedly served I was clocked in, at my job, which has plenty of security camera footage showing me NOT being served. So there's video of me at work NOT being "served in person", plus the security video from my apartment of me NOT being "served in person", and several witnesses that can also attest that it was "sewer service". I have more than enough rock solid evidence to convict this guy of Abuse of Process and Neglige
  3. My thinking was that the more paperwork I can make them do, and the more time and money I can make them spend, the less lucrative my case will be for them to pursue. I read one CIC forum that the law firms usually farm out these cases to rent-a-lawyers with a $1000-$1500 budget @ $100/hour. If you can make them work more than the allotted 10-15 hours, they are then working for free. They are going to quickly move on to the next case as soon as that happens. I read some of the Chase suit and found some useful references. Thanks! I will definitely be looking into the possibility of fra
  4. CALIFORNIA - Process Service Requirements NOT Met - "Sewer Service" I'm being sued by Hunt & Henriques and before I start filing my General Denial papers, I wanted to see if there are other avenues I should take because the summons was not served legally. The date that the case was filed with the court was April 1st. The summons was just slid under the main doors of our apartment building on April 14th. The last entry on Case Summary is: 04/15/2016 PROOF OF SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT FILED. SERVED AS TO (my name without the "JR"). The fact that they left off
  5. Thanks @CCRP626! Below are my answers to the questions. Please let me know if any additional info is needed. If you could also suggest which other sections I should post in, it would be greatly appreciated! ************************** 1.Who is the named plaintiff in the suit? CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A. 2. What is the name of the law firm handling the suit? (should be listed at the top of the complaint.) Hunt & Henriques 3. How much are you being sued for? $8,XXX 4. Who is the original creditor? (if not the Plaintiff) 5. How do you kn
  6. I'm in Los Angeles County and recently had a summons left in the general mail box for our apartment building. I'm being sued by Hunt & Henriques and before I start filing my General Denial papers, I wanted to see if there are other angles I should use based on how the summons was (not really) delivered. First off, the date that it was filed with the court was April 1st. The summons was not discovered in the apartment mailbox until April 14th. It says I have 30 days to file a written response "after this summons and legal papers are served on you". How do they know if and when I