Touchdown

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Content Count

    7

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About Touchdown

  • Rank
    Newbie

Profile Fields

  • Location
    CA

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Touchdown
    Hello @sadinca, I saw many of your posts from a past thread that were in response to interrogatories and requests for admissions. Just curious if you're an attorney of if they were drafted by an attorney, or if you used those for your own cases successfully? As you can see above, I need to respond immediately. Thanks!
  2. Touchdown
    Got it. In the last thread I saw several objections responses for the interrogatories and requests for admissions, is it a bad idea to use those?
  3. Touchdown
    Thanks. I just started a new thread, here it is:
  4. Touchdown
    Additional info - my low income / financial hardship allows me to file for chapter 7 bankruptcy, along with receiving free legal aid to do so. This is not my first choice, but may serve as a negotiating tool for a settlement agreement (my ultimate goal). Does the language above that states "It is mandatory that the court impose a monetary sanction under Chapter 7" mean that even if I file chapter 7 they can still collect?
  5. Touchdown
    (Initially, I posted this in another thread, below is what I posted there) Facts: my case is limited - under $25k, I already had my CMC, they sent me their discovery but I overlooked it and I am now past my 30 days (at about 50 days). I was just served a second time with a copy of the original discovery packet along with a cover letter that states the following: "Under section 2033.280(b), Defendant waived their right to object to any of the requests we propounded on behalf of our client. Accordingly, we now demand that they serve us with their response to request for admissions
  6. Touchdown
    By today
  7. Touchdown
    Hi all, I have a case with Winn/Cavalry from a Citi CC as well. Facts: my case is limited - under $25k, I already had my CMC, they sent me their discovery but I overlooked it and I am now past my 30 days (at about 50 days). I was just served a second time with a copy of the original discovery packet along with a cover letter that states the following: "Under section 2033.280(b), Defendant waived their right to object to any of the requests we propounded on behalf of our client. Accordingly, we now demand that they serve us with their response to request for admissions on or befor