DaisyMae

Members
  • Content Count

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About DaisyMae

  • Rank
    Newbie

Profile Fields

  • Location
    California

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Good news - I won. I finally got them to dismiss (after dealing with 5 different lawyers at Mandarich. Thank you all for your support.
  2. Thank you LaneBlane. I appreciate your suggestions. We actually had our Final Status Conference about 10 days ago. Judge asked plaintiff's attorney who he was going to call as a witness, and if it was going to be a third party witness (it is) judge said it won't work. Also said he's heard similar cases recently with the same problem. Basically told plaintiff they can't win their case. Judge also said my trial brief hit every point needed for my defense - basically that plaintiff has no standing because exhibits offered as evidence are hearsay and don't qualify for hearsay exception. He co
  3. Thank you, all! I really appreciate your comments and suggestions. I'm hoping that after my telephonic Final Status Conference on 4/10 I will have some more info. I submitted my trial brief yesterday and in my (not so humble) opinion, I think it's pretty good. I basically kept saying that they have no admissible evidence to #1 prove standing, and #2 to then prove the allegations in their complaint. It's all hearsay, and not admissible under the Business Records Exception to the Evidence code because they cannot meet all of the requirements of the qualified custodian of records. So far th
  4. BTW Court just granted my request to appear via CourtCall for the FSC, so that's good!
  5. Cach, LLC, represented by Mandarich, sued me for breach of personal guarantee on alleged defaulted loan for $205K. Trial is 4/16/18 and FSC is 4/10/2018. All docs with exception of Trial Briefs have been submitted. Trying to get them to dismiss for lack of standing that is more egregious than usual. Here's what I wrote to their lawyer (who hasn't been a member of Cal Bar for even a year):In the Complaint CACH alleges that it is the “assignee of original creditor Bank of Internet,” but the “Bill of Sale” offered as EXHIBIT 1 to the JOINT EXHIBIT LIST states that CACH purchased some “Charge