• Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About WomanofWonder

  • Rank

Profile Fields

  • Location

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Hey y'all, I'm back! Some updates on this case (maybe not so good, lol). So about 5 months ago the attorneys who bought the old firm checked my credit report. This worried me, but I didn't do anything. Then, Discover themselves checked my credit report about a week ago. I panicked, not gonna lie. So instead of waiting to hear anything, I disputed Discover's entry on my report. Transunion erased it straight away. Still, checking the dockets & the case is still open but dormant. There is no new attorney assigned to the case yet. I've been getting some recent collection calls from a totally different company (was the debt sold again?). Anyway, my questions are: Should I be worried? lol too late, already am. Imagine getting this close & getting hit with a judgment. Should I submit a motion to dismiss? It's wellllll beyond the time period allowed to, I know--but if I can get it dismissed on the simple matter that this attorney is no longer practicing, that gives me a little but to work with...right? Also gonna claim improper service because I never was officially served with further documentation of any filings/motions. Statute of limitations is most definitely up. Do I have a leg up in this case? Even with the dormant suit? Thanks for any help!
  2. I appreciate all of the input given! I'm not too worried, but if push comes to shove I'll fight it as much as I can. If anything, the case can't possibly proceed without someone telling me why I never got notice of a hearing if there was one. I'll brainstorm some possible ways to fight if need be, & update this thread if the case is brought back to life. Thanks again, y'all.
  3. Y'all, I just found this definition on the GA Bar website. I think I'm okay as long as they don't give the case a new attorney. omg. Emeritus Member Member who is not practicing law, is age 70 or greater, has practiced 25 years or more, has same privileges as an inactive member***, however, annual fee is waived. (This status does not permit the member to practice law in Georgia.)
  4. Georgia sucks a lot. In so many ways. I swear, if I knew I would go through this much annoyance I would have never taken out credit in college. Granted, I could have been more responsible--but I feel like I've really shown my current creditors that I'm so different now. When it seems like I get ahead a bit this "ghost" debt comes back to haunt me. But anyhoos. I'm spooked someone's gonna catch it, but as of right now, the defunct attorney is still assigned to my case. A search of his name lists him as having "emeritus" status...so he's retired now, probably? I'm def laying low. lol. No need to stir up any trouble if I don't have to. I can barely scrape up money for basic needs, so I'll just have to deal with it if it does happen to revive itself.
  5. It isn't, but Cooling & Winter are the ones who voluntarily dismissed my case (the one I thanked the forum about for valuable info). A tiny win for me, but the amount wasn't big enough for them to care, I think.
  6. Eeeeek, okay--this makes a lot of sense. I'd rather not tip them off. I'm hoping that I am actually "lost" in all of the shuffle. The SOL will run out April of 2020. If I do make it that far, could I use that as an excuse to cease all action should they figure out that they've missed me? Or would it not count because technically the action was filed prior to the SOL running out? Discover is hella aggressive. It's just dumb luck, I'm sure. I hope I have dumb luck for the next three years, though!
  7. Thanks for the statute-- I was searching for something like that. Hoping someone can weigh in & help me decide which route to go, though. There's risk both ways, I know. If I wait for this particular code, it'll be another two years of hoping no one finds my case & pushes for judgement. On the other hand, I can go for a Motion to Dismiss & hope it's granted. Sticky either way.
  8. Additional notes: There has been no activity in this case since December of 2015.
  9. Hey everyone. I wanted to thank you all for helping me "win" a recent suit filed against me by Portfolio Recovery. With the help of this forum (lurking, haha), I managed to get it dismissed. Without prejudice, mind you, but I'll take what I can get (it wasn't a large amount & I was opting for the arbitration route). NOW I really need some advice for a lawsuit that's been pending since 2015. In fact, I had no idea it was still open until today (after going to the courthouse & checking on the dismissal of my current case). Discover Bank either hired a lawyer (or sold the debt to a law firm collection agency, I'm unsure). This total balance is much higher, much more worrisome. This suit was filed in 2015. I filed an answer, & consulted with a debt defense lawyer who told me that my case was dismissed because she didn't see it on the docket. WELL SHE WAS WRONG. It's been open, is still open, & the lawyer filed a Motion for Summary Judgement along with a Theory of Discovery. This was in December of 2015. There's been no movement since then. I've gotten no sort of communication about any hearings, I've had the same address for 20+ years, so this is throwing me through a loop. In addition to all of that, the lawyer who was suing me is no longer in business. He's sold his firm to another, & they don't even have the same phone number / address. They essentially dropped from the face of the planet (or are operating under a whole new name). Do I file a Motion to Dismiss, or let sleeping dogs lie? I don't want a judgement to come back & bite me in the butt later. I feel that I haven't had any adequate communication from this lawyer, & that alone should be a basis for dismissal. Coupled with the fact that there's no feasible way to contact the original law office that decided to sue me. Your thoughts / suggestions would be much appreciated! - - - 1. Who is the named plaintiff in the suit? Discover Bank. 2. What is the name of the law firm handling the suit? (should be listed at the top of the complaint.) - - - 3. How much are you being sued for? $3k+ 4. Who is the original creditor? (if not the Plaintiff) Discover Bank. 5. How do you know you are being sued? (You were served, right?) Served. 6. How were you served? (Mail, In person, Notice on door) In person by the sheriff. 7. Was the service legal as required by your state? Yes. 8. What was your correspondence (if any) with the people suing you before you think you were being sued? I remember requesting validation & they sent me a packet of past statements. That's it. 9. What state and county do you live in? Georgia. 10. When is the last time you paid on this account? (looking to establish if you are outside of the statute of limitations) April of 2014. 11. What is the SOL on the debt? It's either 4 or 6 years--probably 6, but if I can argue 4, I will. 😕 12. What is the status of your case? Suit served? Motions filed? You can find this by a) calling the court or looking it up online (many states have this information posted - when you find the online court site, search by case number or your name). Open. 13. Have you disputed the debt with the credit bureaus (both the original creditor and the collection agency?) No. 14. Did you request debt validation before the suit was filed? Note: if you haven't sent a debt validation request, don't bother doing this now - it's too late. Yes. 15. How long do you have to respond to the suit? (This should be in your paperwork). If you don't respond to the lawsuit notice you will lose automatically. In 99% of the cases, they will require you to answer the summons, and each point they are claiming. We need to know what the "charges" are. Please post what they are claiming. Did you receive an interrogatory (questionnaire) regarding the lawsuit? I answered within the 30-day time frame. 16. What evidence did they send with the summons? An affidavit? Statements from the OC? Contract? List anything else they attached as exhibits. I have to dig through my papers to find this, ugh. - - - Help please & thanks !