lucig284

Members
  • Content Count

    125
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

10 Good

About lucig284

  • Rank
    Impressive 100+ postings

core_pfieldgroups_99

  • Occupation
    Domestic Engineer

Profile Fields

  • Location
    West Central FLorida
  1. OK, now that I know that they are NOT licensed here in Florida, should I add that bit of info to my DV/SOL letter. They evidently bought out an old account from somewhere and it is way past the SOL. What would be the best way to word my letter to them?? I haven't done this in awhile.. Thanks in advance.. Luci
  2. Can anyone tell me if Midland Funding LLC is licensed in Florida? I can't seem to locate the information. Thanks,
  3. Do I have to wait until the original 30 period I gave them in my DV letter to write to them (WWR) again?? Sherman is WAY past the 30 days I gave them back in 2003.. Also, If it isn't too much trouble could you tell me what to quote in my letter as far as Continued collection goes. My brain is starting to go to mush.. Bumping for advise..
  4. Do I have to wait until the original 30 period I gave them in my DV letter to write to them (WWR) again?? Sherman is WAY past the 30 days I gave them back in 2003.. Also, If it isn't too much trouble could you tell me what to quote in my letter as far as Continued collection goes. My brain is starting to go to mush..
  5. Bumping for some advise on this one..
  6. No it's not reporting.. I sent a DV letter to SHERMAN in Oct. 2003 which they did not bother responding to..but they did remove their entry on the CR.. They are trying to collect on an old Sears account which is being listed on the CR as CBUSASEARS. For the life of me, I can't figure out where SHERMAN is even coming from. What should I add to the letter I'm sending to both WWR and Sherman to make them stop screwing with me??
  7. Ok guys, what is your take on this one.. On Dec.13th I sent a letter to W. W.& R in response to a letter I received from them on behalf of SHERMAN ACQUISITION. In the letter I not only requested validation of the supposed debt, I also made them aware that my numerous communications with SHERMAN ACQUISITIONS and their affiliates, (I have Copies of the Certified mailings w/ signature receipts on file) have all gone unanswered and that I have reason to believe the debt is not a valid debt. I reiterated that SHERMAN has never shown proof of their claim and that ANY claim that they may or may
  8. Yep.. it's 4 yrs for an open account here in FL
  9. I'd also add in my communications with Sherman the fact that they are NOT licensed in FLorida or Texas where they send most of their crap from. They folded like a cheap suit when I sent them copies of certificates of non compilance.
  10. The same thing happened to me. I called my local post office and asked what could be done since I paid for CMRRR. They used the number on my receipt to pull up a copy of who signed for the letter and requested a duplicate be sent to me. I received it.. complete with the name, date ,and time within 5 days. Give them a call.. you paid for a service and it was not provided.
  11. I think we should ALL tell em what we think !!!! http://www.ftc.gov/opa/2004/06/fyi0439.htm
  12. Have you received a dunning letter for the supposed account??
  13. I sent them an email listing the dates, times and name of the person that signed for every letter I sent to them requesting validation. I pointed out that I had not received any response from them yet they were continuing to verify with the CRA's. I listed a bunch of violations. "It is my opinion that you have violated several sections of the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act these acts by: --Failing to validate a debt as allowed to the debtor under 15 USC 1692 (g) Section 809 ( " --Failing to notify the credit reporting agencies that the accounts were in
  14. I have had the pleasure of trying to deal with Mr. Penner... After I sent my original email to rlavin@arrow-financial.com and jlavin@arrow-financial.com they tried to pawn me off on Penner... What a waste.. Here is how he responded to my email "It appears from your record that payments were made on this account back in 2002. Please clarify with me if you are now under the impression that the account is satisfied." Needless to say I went on to inform both him and Mr. Lavin that a statement of: It appears from your record that payments were made on this account back in 2002. Please clarify
  15. J. Sorry it didn't work for you like it did for me.. Maybe Wilansky is getting over-run.. lucig284