-
Content Count
1,528 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
11
Savoir last won the day on August 18 2015
Savoir had the most liked content!
Community Reputation
312 ExcellentAbout Savoir
-
Rank
500 posts and hasn't been banned yet....
Profile Fields
-
Location
The Great White North
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
Any motion to the court will cost you $20.00; filing an answer doesn't cost anything. You would need to supply the terms and conditions that entitle you to arbitration from a GE credit card agreement that was in effect during the time frame that you allegedly weren't in default as evidence that you are entitled to arbitration. If you file this Motion to Compel and Stay in Lieu of an Answer and the Judge denies the motion it should not prevent you from filing an answer to the allegations against you. Here are a few GE Credit card agreements if you don't have your original. http:\\www.cardmember
-
HELP! being Sued by Cavalry SPV I, LLC in Michigan
Savoir replied to rizky1's topic in Is There a Lawyer in the House
You need to file an answer (with affirmative defenses) denying all their allegations and an affidavit (Sworn Denial) stating that this is not your debt (if it can be truthfully sworn to). There are plenty of examples on this forum to get ideas from but, you need to do this ASAP (before the deadline expires) otherwise, they get a default judgment against you. You listed several documents that they supplied as evidence but, you didn't mention if they included a sworn affidavit. Did they? -
SOL in Michigan - Clarification
Savoir replied to fearthereaper's topic in Is There a Lawyer in the House
This is close! Usually a creditor doesn't charge off an account until 180 days has past from the day the last alleged payment was made so, you should be beyond the SOL in MI. You should gather records together so as to prove the date of the last payment to this alleged account. I wouldn't worry about DV until they contact you in an open manner! -
Help with Response to Request for Admission
Savoir replied to Mrogdog078's topic in Is There a Lawyer in the House
ROG's is short for Interrogatories. RFA's is short for Request for Admissions. -
Received Attorney notices today stating LVNF filed lawsuit
Savoir replied to IFC's topic in Is There a Lawyer in the House
Those notices are from ambulance chasing lawyers who will usually take your money and then just advise you to settle the debt or file for bankruptcy protection. You can initiate either of those two choices without their aid. You can also fight this out in court yourself as many of us have done successfully. LVNV is a junk debt buyer and, as is usually the case, rarely have the documentation to prove their claims. You can wait to be served or be proactive and go to the courthouse in your jurisdiction and look at the filings for your case number to get a head start. Search the board for post -
Nice !
-
Being Sued by Portfolio Recovery in Michigan
Savoir replied to bureabe's topic in Is There a Lawyer in the House
I don't know if you have this; it''s the Michigan Evidence Benchbook. Read Chapter 1.2 Motion in Limine through Chapter 1.4 C Self-Authentication -
Being Sued by Portfolio Recovery in Michigan
Savoir replied to bureabe's topic in Is There a Lawyer in the House
Hopefully you read MRE 1001 - 1008 as there are certain requirements that the 'duplicate' must pass before the original is required. If it were me I'd have a motion in limine ready to file with the court if they don't have the original (or it looks suspicious to you). Plaintiff must get that 'evidence' to you 2 days prior to resumption of trail; that should give you time to file your motion. Take a copy of your motion to trial in case the judge doesn't read it beforehand and be ready to argue it. Case law wouldn't hurt .............. I don't know that this will work ......... but it's my b -
Being Sued by Portfolio Recovery in Michigan
Savoir replied to bureabe's topic in Is There a Lawyer in the House
I don't know if it is possible or not .......... trial has already begun and then adjourned. MCR 2.506 I don't know that I would want to pay the expense of having a witness appear when they may not have or be able to get the 'spreadsheet' anyway. If they do present you with some sort of 'spreadsheet' it better be authentic and not something that you or I could produce in a few minutes with Excel. Best evidence rule (MRE 1002) with in camera inspection? -
Being Sued by Portfolio Recovery in Michigan
Savoir replied to bureabe's topic in Is There a Lawyer in the House
Obviously, they are shooting for proof of standing here. All I can say is that they better have a rock solid connection between the affidavit and the alleged 'spreadsheet' that the affidavit refers to. -
Being Sued by Portfolio Recovery in Michigan
Savoir replied to bureabe's topic in Is There a Lawyer in the House
Calm down and............ explain what you meant by the above statement. Show what information? From what spreadsheet? I can't decipher what this statement means.