
jims86lxihb
Members-
Content Count
70 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Community Reputation
11 GoodAbout jims86lxihb
-
Rank
Newbie
Profile Fields
-
Location
California
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
-
Federal bankruptcy code is very specific about what you cannot walk away from. Crying, hey he elected arbitration isn't one of those things. Your ok.
-
pm CALAWYER and ask him to look at this thread and if he can give you his imput. follow the link below and pm him http://www.creditinfocenter.com/community/user/53879-calawyer/m
-
Trial is Continued..Questions about Deadlines
jims86lxihb replied to Martini's topic in Is There a Lawyer in the House
If this is a debt discharged by bankrupcy why do we care about anything other then how to kick it out of court as such? -
The court order only covers the stay of preceedings. No order exists to compel arbitration into one forum or the other. H&H sent me a CM-180 form along with a AAA arb application. According to my research H&H filed the CM-180 to advise the court that they filed the AAA docs (and to attempt to intimidate me,...yawn ). Because of the stay, filing the CM-180 suspends any obligations that the plaintiff's attorney ordinarily has to prosecute a lawsuit in a state court in a timely manner. I filled my JAMS papers Jan 22, Citi has filed AAA on Feb 5th. I know for a fact JAMS has mailed docs t
-
I was told by a clerk on the phone then when they filed for the hearing with the court, that they were told they could not attach the proposed order. They were told to redo the order. When they showed up for the hearing, they still did not have the rewritten order. As of yesterday, no order has been submitted to the court. HOWEVER, I picked this up yesterday at the clerks office. LAW & MOTION MINUTES: EXPARTE APPLICATION AND REQUEST FOR STAY OF PRECEDINGS HEARING APPERANCES: PLAINTIFF:CITIBANK WITH ATTORNEY JAMES PADRON SPECIALLY APPEARING FOR MICHAEL HUNT (rental layer ha ha) DEFENDANT: Y
-
First off, thank you very much for your post. I sure didn't know about the rules. Let me make sure I understand this correctly. H&H sends me the proposed order. I then can object at that time. Correct? Is my objection limited to the choice of words or can I object to the level of the core issue,.....my 2010 cardmember agreement with affidavit nullifies there use of a 2009 cardmember agreement presented without a affidavit.?
-
Oh kay. I called the clerks office again just to make sure. They confirmed the judge stayed the trial. On the other matter about citi requesting a motion to compel arb with AAA they do not know. Turns out then H&H filled the motion last week they were told that they could not have the stay request and the demand for AAA arb on the same paper. So, either the Judge denied the request for AAA arb or he approved it. Won't really know until the plaintiff rewrites the order papers for the judge.
-
I cannot believe this. Showed up at 3pm and waited and waited. I finally asked one of the security guys what the delay was. Hearing was at 10am,......I missed it. I just cannot believe that just KNEW it was 3pm. Note to self, don't just look at the time once. I called the clerks office and all that shows is the stay being granted (no timeline mentioned btw). No mention is made of the attorney for citi's proposed order to compel arbitration with aaa. Does that mean that the judge actually read the file and saw my affidavit for the 2010 agreement and disallowed their request? What are the cha