• Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

10 Good

About WildBill

  • Rank
    CIC Member

Profile Fields

  • Location
  1. Nice to see Shills like Prosay and 2nd time here trying to discredit what many of us already know, having witnessed others Win their foreclosure cases. They work for the other side folks, and thats why theyre here, not to help. Far as their question goes.. One tactic, if confronted with a foreclosure, is to elect mediation or an evidenciary hearing, to request the title evidencing ownership, or lack thereof.. At the mediation, simply demand the Assignments, i.e., the Assignments which would cure the problem (according to Judge Riegle’s March 31, 2009, opinion, as affirmed by Judge Dawson on D
  2. This is THE Transcript of her case....Read the Railroad job and violations of Due Process. http://adask.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/090811-2009-07-20-baran-hrg-b4-rouse-hnk.pdf That is why its under appeal. The Judge should be disbarred and may when she is done with him.
  3. The mortgage loan applicant has to put a certain amount of money down on the loan. Those funds are delivered to the mortgage lender, which is a bank. Through the legal yet unlawful practice of fractional reserve lending, the bank utilizes its franchise to create credit by making a double entry accounting record as follows: a mortgage loan is created that is 10, 20, or 30 times the amount of the down payment deposited. This is recorded as an asset, which is a debit. A corresponding liability is created for the payoff to the seller that will occur at closing. This is a credit. The bank is in c
  4. The essence of “foreclosure-gate” is that the banks that made the original mortgage loans have in many, perhaps most, maybe all instances of mortgages issued over the past 10 to perhaps 20 years, SOLD the original note and/or mortgage to a third party. Once the bank sold either the note or the mortgage, that bank has no more standing to foreclose on a particular house than I do to drive a car I sold to someone else five years ago. The banks have been foreclosing on properties without legal authority to do so. Not a few properties. Hundreds of thousands. Maybe 1 to 2 million. This is not a pap
  5. Turns out, Donnas case has Re opened in the lower court. And case is active and pending in the Supreme Court in FL. Not all parties were served, a huge court violation, so Judge will likely be recused, and the case will be overturned! He will be the 3rd Judge dismissed from the case for improper procedures. I would not bet against Donna, and all of her valuables will have to be returned to her by the Banksters, along with her home, and her counter claims hopefully awarded to her. Her issue was Subject Matter Jurisdiction, Evidenciary hearings and wet copy of her mortgage, note, (Marked Paid
  6. Its exactly the problem we have, and even worse..and the nutjobs are those like you supporting the system at hand, and worse, Shilling for it. The debt is paid for, At Closing, with our signature. The debt is then sold, banks are able to loan more money, and we are billed for a debt we just created with our signature and actually paid for, and pay it at interest, 2-3xs the amount of the money created. "It is well enough that people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.' -Henry Ford
  7. The Mortgage and Banking Industry is Ripe with Fraud, Bailouts and Bonuses. Donna Baran and others like her, exposed them and their fraud. If fighting a fraudulent foreclosure is a deadbeat, so be it. Props to her. MSNBC: ”This crisis is all about fraud . . . . There were millions of acts of fraud. . . . this corrupt banking system . . . .” Fraud is criminal. The Fraudclosure scandal involves the institutionalized theft of millions of American homes and the injury and/or destruction of millions of American families. When “fraudclosure” is fully understood. Banks will fail. The federal gove
  8. You will be on the phone for hours at a time, trying to get through customer service. You will be hung up on, transferred to the wrong department, or perhaps somewhere in India or the Phillipine 'call center' only to be told to send or fax in paperwork. You will call back a week later asking if they recieved it and they will tell you they never got it....and they you start the process all over again. Been there, done that. I had Several rental properties, all under water, all in depreciating markets. Screw them before they screw you and dont waste your time. Keep the property as long as you
  9. Contractually it seems unlawful for them to collect on debt when they violated the law, as indicated by the class action Id like a REAL attorney to weigh in, not a rent one, like the many here that check in to tell it like it aint..
  10. Can this be used in a defense? Citi Credit Card Customers May Benefit from Class Action Lawsuit By LowCards.com | Last updated Sep 15, 2010, 5:04 pm If you had a credit card account with Citibank between May 5, 2002 and May 24, 2010, and your interest rate was increased as a result of a default or delinquency, you could get a payment from a class action settlement. A proposed class action settlement has been reached in a lawsuit brought against Citibank involving increases to the interest rate on Citibank credit cards due to delinquency or default. (Note: the name of the case is Hoffman v. Ci
  11. Short sales are for idiots. Bad advice but figures from the resident shills here... The Lender will give YOU the 1099 for the deficiency between the sold price and what was owed on the note-can you say tens of thousands of dollars? Then you got the IRS on your back. Better to keep you money, fight the FC and stay 7-12 months in the home, at least. The only person that wins in a short sale is the new buyer and lender. Screw them before they screw you.
  12. Read the Donna Baran thread.... Produce the Note, as a strategy will work, but it is only part of what the overall strategy is, knowing your rights, and then asserting them. The Courts are corrupt, but there are lots of defenses. And theres Lots of shills on here, so beware of them.
  13. 'Some people think the Federal Reserve Banks are US government institutions. They are not. They are private credit monopolies which prey upon the people of the US for the benefit of themselves and their foreign and domestic swindlers, and rich and predatory money lenders. The sack of the United States by the Fed is the greatest crime in history. Every effort has been made by the Fed to conceal its powers, but the truth is the Fed has usurped the government. It controls everything here and it controls all our foreign relations. It makes and breaks governments at will.' - Congressman Louis M
  14. A friend of mine, now deceased, wrote this. Heres a preview. There are two kinds of federal taxes, only two: direct and indirect. There is no third kind of federal tax. The law - the Constitution - says that all federal taxes must be one or the other. Indeed, in Stanton v. Baltic Mining (240 US 103), the same judges said the same thing and added that their previous ruling, in Brushaber, created "no new power of taxation." Nothing had changed since the Court ruled the income tax unconstitutional in 1894, in Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust (158 US 601). The trouble with the tax today is
  15. Is that the best you got? Youre arguing that our Unconstitutional taxes, are indirectly imposed? Another government boot licking shill....lots of them here on this forum. IRS, Federal Reserve, Declared Unconstitutional to Apply Income Tax Chris Carucci '[bThe Income Tax is a Direct Tax that is Not apportioned, meaning spread amongst the people. The Constitution states that there be No tax that is direct and not apportioned. Income as defined in Slaughter-House Cases, supra; Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U. S. 11; Giozza v. Tiernan, 148 U. S. 657, 148 U. S. 662; Mugler v. Kansas, 123 U. S. 6