ASTMedic

I don't remember how the CMC was scheduled, it's been a few years now. If you have a thread started post in that and someone will answer it for you. Sounds like with the law being clarified now on the service of the subpoena they are basically hoping you mess up something they can capitalize on.

If they give you 2 pick one and serve it but tell the process server to only serve the person listed. If they give you one you will have to argue that they didn't follow the law as written.

I love hearing that my struggles have/still help people long after my fight is over. I've recovered from my poor credit decisions and you will too. The service of the subpoena has/will always be the biggest weakness of the junk debt buyers court case. That's why I stressed its importance so strongly. Its good to see that it's being backed now. Again, I'm truly blessed when I see how many people I've been able to help. I didn't get any return of my fees when I won so seeing others win makes up for that.

You're welcome. Start a new thread and people will give you a hand. Kick some butt!

Start your our post and people will give you a hand.

I'm going to be honest, it's been a while and I could only tell you what's in the paperwork. I used a general denial since that needs no defenses. It gives them nothing to grab on to. Keep things vague as possible so they have nothing to work with. That was the whole plane through out my case was to respond with as little as possible to make them think I was just like everyone else and had no idea what I needed to do.

Yep I saw it. I'm glad it helped

Mopar, thanks for the kind words. I haven't been on here in a long time but I'm glad to see all my hard work is still helping others win.

They list an address in WA for service of this no name "witness"? So they're WAY outside the 150 mile limit???? Done deal

Hey all. I'm still around. Mostly answer just PM's since I never look at the threads. I'm reading the PM's that are sent to more than one of us but only chime in if I have a point to make. Just cus I don't answer doesn't mean I'm not reading along with what people are saying. Feel free to keep sending PM's if you have a question to ask me. Keep up the good fight folks.

We obviously don't half a$$ things like they do so always have your docs ready but I'll be surprised if they are allowed to use the evidence. Sounds like your court gave them a good slap when they didn't file for the CMC. As I said don't go and get lazy but I think you're doing very well and it will all look good to the judge.

Good to see this is still helping out

If they intend to use the "affidavit" then they better be ready to bring a witness and the "affidavit" better conform to CCP 2015.5. Most are not properly attacking the affidavits when they are submitted and thats why they loose. (I know its an old post but some of us are slow. SO SUE ME!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL)