texasrocker

There is definitely grounds for appeal. That judge was 100% wrong as Texas small claims courts were abolished in 2013.

@fisthardcheese

You need to file an answer with the court before the deadline given in the summons. For your answer use the same format as the Plaintiff's Original Petition that you were served with the court and case information on top of the page. DEFENDANT'S ORIGINAL ANSWER Comes now, <your name>, the Defendant in the above styled and numbered cause and files this Original Answer in this action and would respectfully show the following: I. GENERAL DENIAL Defendant generally denies each and every, all and singular, of the allegations set forth in the Plaintiff's Original Pet

No they are not. Small claims courts were abolished in 2013.

@fisthardcheese

That is not even a link. Try uploading them to imgur.com and they will generate a URL to a page showing all of your images. Post that URL here.

No, Tried both Firefox and Chrome.

Your images are not working.

I am assuming you filed a motion for the court's approval to begin discovery in a JP court as there is no such thing as a "motion for discovery" in Texas. What is the name of the attorney that filed the suit? Can you post a copy of the motion you filed and the objection they filed (with your personal information redacted of course.)

@fisthardcheese

You need to ask your clerk of court if you must schedule a hearing as each court has its own rules on that. You don't need to include all of that "verbiage" with your answer. A simple general denial is efficient. Some may disagree but I will always say to pay the $6 for a signed certified mail receipt from USPS for their copy of anything you file with the court. JDB attorneys are among the lowest of the low and will lie or be otherwise deceptive one way or another throughout the case. When you produce the green card showing a signature of someone in their office they will have a hell

I am assuming that a"ZOOM" hearing is an online or some other type of video court appearance that does not require actually showing up in person, correct? @fisthardcheese

Scott and associates are about as wimpy as Rausch, Strom and co. Too lazy to do any work if they don’t automatically get granted a default judgment when the vast majority of defendants fail to even file an answer.

Excellent. One of my favorite words, "non-suit"

One word- @fisthardcheese