lost_inaz

Members
  • Content Count

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

10 Good

About lost_inaz

  • Rank
    Newbie

Profile Fields

  • Location
    az
  1. the whole 3 yr sol argument and the new az law is ex past facto
  2. do i deny that arizona has jurisdiction over this matter since contract was under delaware law?
  3. can I respond to the summons make my defense the standing Issue than file a motion to dismiss based on the sol of 3 yr has ran its course than make verbal arguments that the 2011 new law doesnt apply to my case?
  4. Do I send a subpoena duces tecum for the bill of sale/ account history/ proof of their standing?
  5. state of account looks like a print off the jdb screen and affidavid from am system, llc's manger to the best of his knowledge its true.?????
  6. I went to the court house to pick up my complaint was served by clerk. last payment open 8/23/05 last pay7/11/07 interest 2,537.92 I. that Plaintiff is an Arizona limited liability comany and is at this time, assignee of Defendant's contract with chase bank usa, n.a II. That defendant(s) is/are /were resident(s) of maricopa county, Arizona and the venue is porper in this Court. III. That in all matters mentioned herein, the defandants(s) acted as agent for,on behalf of and in furtherance of his or her marital community, if any. Iv. that heretofore and prior to the filing of this action defendant(s)did, for valuable consideration, enter into a contractual obligation with chase bank usa, n.a. or its assignee as is evidenced by plaintiff's affidavit and statement of account attached hereto as well as in the supporting documentation (when applicable) attached hereto and by reference made a part hereof. v. that said the defendant(s) has/have failed to pay approprate charges when due. vI that the balance remaining due and unpaid on said contract at the time of this complaint is the principal amount of 2,643.67 together with accrued and accruing interest and late fee's pursuant to contract from 2/29/08 until paid in full, less payments, adjustments or offsets. Vii. that said defendant (s) has failed and/or refused to pay said balance despite plaintiff having made upon defendants (s) for such sums due and owing and that said balance is justly due and owing the plaintiff named herein. Wherefore, Plaintiff demands judgement against defendant (s) and each of them, as follows: 1. for principal sum 2643.67, less payments, adjustments and offsets (if applicable). 2. for the accrued interest and late fees from the original charge-off date of 02/29/08 through 02/28/2012 at the rate of 24.00% 3. for the accruing interest on the principal from 2/28/2012 at the contract rate of 24.00% until paid in full. 4. for court costs incurred herein. 5. for reasonable attorney fees pursuant to contract and/or Ars 12-341.01. 6.for accruing interest on the costs and fees as awarded by the court. 7. for such other and further relief as the court may deem appropriate.