monpetitpede

Members
  • Content Count

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

10 Good

About monpetitpede

  • Rank
    Newbie

Profile Fields

  • Location
    Texas
  1. Thanks for your response. I went with the broker because he was one of two preferred lenders. My contract had a preferred lender addendum that the seller would pay for title if I used one of their 2 lenders. I started worker with the banker but she was extremely disorganized and after doing research found out that she was notorious for not being ready to close and failing to tell her clients about large fees. I considered buying a house, but location was more important to me (South Congress). I can't afford a 3 br house in this area (in my specific location those start at $300k). I didn't have 20% to put down, that was the premise underlying my post. I appreciate the listing of houses in Austin at a similar purchase price, though I've already looked. I'm in a contract and scheduled to close.
  2. Question for the knowledgable folk here: I'm scheduled to close on my new condo on July 23rd here in Texas. The purchase contract is for $157k with $4k in closing costs paid by seller. I have been approved for a 30-year fixed FHA loan with 3.5% down payment at 3.625% with 0 points. Up front mortgage insurance is $2600 (rolled into the loan) with $157/mo MI premium. My broker has told me that the mortgage insurance premium must be paid on an FHA loan for either at least the first 5 years or until I have at least 20% equity, regardless of whether I make a 3.5% or 20% down payment (i.e. even if I immediately have 20% equity I still have to pay mortgage insurance up front and for 5 years). Is this true? In the eleventh hour, my mother has offered to lend me the 16.5% I would need for a 20% down payment with no fees over 10 years at 4% interest for 3 years and then 5% for 7 years. Until now, a conventional mortgage was never even on my radar. I asked my broker to compare and he quoted me 4.00% interest on a 30-year fixed conventional mortgage. He said that my credit score (735) meant a 1/8 % rate increase and that condominiums built before a certain year in Austin (1970-something?) with less than 25% down warranted another 1/8 % rate increase. I would be paying my mother $264/mo initially and then slightly more after 3 years as opposed to the $157/mo mortgage insurance premium and reduction in principle and interest of the up front mortgage insurance premium ($2600) and 16.5% of the original FHA loan amount. I'm in nursing because I'm admittedly terrible at math. I'm trying to figure out which one would result in the lower monthly payment and what my true savings would be going the conventional loan route. If I kept the mortgage for 30 years I would obviously save the most, but what if I only planned on keeping the property for 10 or 15 years? Frankly, this whole process has been exhausting and I'm not thinking as clearly as I was at the beginning of the process. Luckily I can afford either one and I'm not buying outside of my means. I know I'll just be upset with myself a few years down the line if I ultimately picked the more expensive option. Any thoughts you guys have would be appreciated. Dave (first-time home buyer)