Jump to content


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited


  • Interests
    RC dirt bikes, truck, Mini bike and Pit bike.
  • Occupation

Profile Fields

  • Location

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

machinebike's Achievements

Impressive 100+ postings

Impressive 100+ postings (5/6)



  1. depends on what the value was and how much was added.
  2. Anyone familar with the term? something about private land and the Federal government. don't know a whole lot and was wondering if anyone understood it.
  3. I disagree. Its not a guess. 'for loan received, I promise to pay'.... How can you receive a loan? You receive the value that was given as a loan. Where is the value that was received? As I mentioned, the lack of proof IS the proof. Now please prove what the loan was.
  4. Amerikaner, and everyone,, I opologize to everyone , if unintentional insulting occurs. Concerning proof, How can I give you proof of something, I have no proof it exists? The lack of proof...is the proof. How can I prove a loan doesn't exist if I'm not told what the loan was, so i can prove it doesn't exists? How can I prove paper dollars has no value if i'm not told what the value is? I need to know the value to disprove the value. Amerikaner, BV, can you understand how I feel? I would like for you to share something exists, so I can share with you why I feel it doesn't exist. Words like "loan" is not the proof of a loan, etc.....
  5. BV, you wrote "Information we provide is supported by law and the courts". I was asking what law are you refering to? Concerning"supported by law"....but what law? I know courts deal with commercial law, is that the law you are refering to? Thanks Amerikana, for locking the other thread, I can get a fresh start with less confusion. When I refer to 'common sense", Im using that term NOT in an insulting manner, but in a manner to be used as evidence. Common sense is part of natural law, not commercial law. If we read something that doesn't "add up", that's what we should be questioning the lenders and servicers (or accountants). I understand that's why 'legal" exists, to make it APPEAR as if it is lawful by trying to make it "add up" through a bunch of high tech sounding "legal wording". Another common sense example as proof...... If you look at your mort docs, you may read "For loan received, I promise to pay..." OK, Here we go....What loan? It doesn't say. ALSO, if you were given a loan, it would say "I promise to pay BACK". Thats more proof for us if we choose to recognize it. Can you see? When you ask me for proof, I am giving you proof by pointing out the "lack of proof" in the documents.
  6. My response... I do not know of any. Courthouses are for legal. I am trying to share for what is lawful and is not meant to be turned into a court case. It is meant for someone to understand they are not asking the right questions. This legal mortgage stuff continues because we don ask the right questions and disagree with what is being done. So why wouldnt they throw a family out of their house so they can generate more profits......because we don't question their actions based on what is LAWFUL, we are questioning their actions based on what is LEGAL. In other words, its legal to throw a family out of their house for not paying on a phony debt, BUT... because living beings are being harmed, it is UNLAWFUL. Society has placed more importance on legal documents for profit sake, but neglects the living beings that causes the documents to exist in the first place!
  7. I'm surprised I am responding to some of these comments but I know our artificial reality has not sunk in yet, so I remain inspired. This information should be questioned concerning who manages your 'life' account. This concerns whoever you allowed to control your funds taken out of your depository, should be liable to giving you correct answers. I'm not talking about the kind of answers someone hopes to hear in a courtroom, but the kind of answers someone hopes to hear in real life...TRUTHFUL answers. Does any one here NOT like being told truthful answers? Anyone? What about honesty, does anyone like for someone to be dishonest to them? Why dont you tryan put your servicer 'to the test', and ask them some questions you feel may not really matter, and see if you get a response. And if the rare moment did occur and they told the truth, would you believe them anyway? The Financial world known to us, exists on paper. And thats how we are recognized. A reason we have an identity made up letters/symbols/codes, so we can be identified and seperated from other entities, real or artifical. EVERY letter counts. Every symbol, every code, every dot, EVERYTHING printed on a paper documents was printed that way for a specific reason, not because they decided to be creative with your name. Look at your check and you name. It is written as how a business could be written, then take a magnifying glass to the line where you sign your name and notice 'Authorized signature' written in fine print. You authorize funds taken from the business account set up in likeness of your name. But don't take my word for it, go to your depository and ask them directly. But will you believe them? BV, Id like for you to answwer the question concerning "truth and honesty" in my other post, or it will become more difficult for me to view your answers as....honest.
  8. Amerikaner, you need to look in a legal dictionary that deals with "commercial law". If the letters of your name is altered other then how you spell it, there is a reason for it. If you cannot understand the writings, then try common sense. Need proof? Get a pen and piece of paper and sign your name.
  9. on documents. Notice how you spell your name to identify yourself when communicating through paper? Now notice how your name is spelled on documents? All caps. Can you remember a time in your life you spelled your name in all caps? If you do not, then why are they? a fictitious "paper debt" requires a fictitious identity in order to "legally" collect from some one....a middle man, or commonly refered as "straw man". ' Although I am using the phrase 'straw man' so you can relate to what I am sharing, but d not consider it to be an exact term refering to an all capitalized name. Burtons Legal Thesaurus: Capitalized---> utilize for profit, manipulate, take advantage of. You may view "Capital gain" differently than what originally believed. Ask your depository about the "straw man".
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.