SleeplessinNY

Members
  • Content Count

    40
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

10 Good

About SleeplessinNY

  • Rank
    Newbie
  • Birthday 12/19/1959

Profile Fields

  • Location
    New York
  1. My first tri(al) - Judge ruled that debt was mine and JDB purchased it :waah: But..I could tell he DOES NOT like them or their attorneys. He almost dismissed it, but at least helped me negotiate/settle for less than 50% with "almost" affordable payments. I was very nervous and unsure of myself. Not happy with outcome but was afraid of it being worse. I still don't like what these JDB are doing. Unfortunately I have quite a bit more crap heading my way very soon. I appreciate all the help I received here. I better get cracking & studying up for the next bout. I guess I was expecting them to dismiss the suit when I didn't let them have it by default but look who's laughing now.
  2. This is something I found describing the Preliminary Conference in NYS - Can anyone simplify this into plain English for me? Almost every action filed in state court becomes the subject of a preliminary conference, which is commonly known as a "PC." The preliminary conference is governed by Uniform Trial Court Rule section 202.12. That rule states, in pertinent part, that the matters to be considered at the preliminary conference include: a) where appropriate, simplification and limitation of factual and legal issues; establishment of a timetable for completion of disclosure consistent with the requirements of Differentiated Case Management (unless otherwise shortened or lengthened by the court); c) addition of other necessary parties; d) removal to a lower court where appropriate and e) other matters that the court may deem relevant such as a date for filing a Note of Issue, and a closure date for dispositive motions. Finally, at that time the court will schedule a compliance conference at which time the parties are to return to court. A preliminary conference can be scheduled by the court at any time sua sponte. but it is most often scheduled at the request of a party upon the filing of such request along with a request for judicial intervention ("RJI"), in a case which has not previously been assigned to an IAS judge. Pursuant to subdivision (, the conference shall be scheduled not more than 45 days from the date the request for judicial intervention is filed, unless the court orders otherwise. The initiation of motion practice concerning discovery in unassigned cases was the impetus for the writing of this entry. The most frequent scenario invloves a plaintiff that fails to serve discovery and/or a bill of particulars in response to demands that accompany a defendant's answer. In which case, the apparently uninformed defendant ultimately resorts to a motion to compel a response under CPLR 3124 and/or 3042©. The foregoing motion practice is an imprudent use of both the attorney's time and client's resources. Pursuant to Trial Court Rule 202.8(f), the aforestated motion will be procedurally converted into a preliminary conference which, in accordacne with section 202.12, must be scheduled for a date no more than 45 days after the chosen motion return date.Accordingly, where the motion is propounded instead of the service and fliling of a request for a PC and RJI, the attorneys for the moving defendant will have advanced plaintiff's cause by incurring the cost of the RJI, in addition to an unnecessary motion filing fee.
  3. Well, I am due back in front of the judge this afternoon, I know the judge wants me to settle. This is a preliminary conference, and I just received (by order of the judge) the JDB "ownership" documents yesterday to review. I am assuming it means that nothing has been entered as evidence. So therefore I can't not object to the documents - is that correct? As I stated in an earlier post: The "instructions" say to provide the court with "marked pleadings" and "bills of particulars". Therefore, how do I continue to claim the plaintiff "JDB"'s lack of standing to the judge to allow this to go to trial? Should I request that I need further discovery? Do I need to make a motion or a pleading? I read the laws and do not understand where this prelim conference is in the process. There was a paper that I signed yesterday with the JDB's substitute attorney (maybe I shouldn't have?) it was for discovery stipulation and order, essentially giving a 10 day window for filing for any more discovery and a deadline for completing, but since the judge was pushing for a settlement it was not filed for his signature. I must admit I started to panic when the judge did not readily allow this to proceed to the next phase of suit. Don't I have the right to a trial? I am sure they don't want to "waste" their time on these matters, but I am not the one who filed.
  4. Yes I guess I shouldn't have said I did have a chase card in the past but I didn't want to commit perjury. The local atty that was present was ordered to request ownership docs from midlands atty and we did not receive prior to lunch recess. The judge was annoyed that I wouldn't settle and ordered us back at 2. The attorney supposedly emailed them to me and tried showing me on his cell phone the chain of custody documents such as bill of sale,closing statement from chase to midland (for a pool of accounts) affidavit of sale signed by an "officer" of chase and a print out of an account general work screen with my name address last 4 of ss and chase account #. A Providian card holder agreement. Pre legal reminder. MCM statements and other "chase printouts" along with a slew of chase statements. I told the atty I could not determine the validity in 1 minute and we were called up before the judge. The judge asked if I received the documents and I said no. He was cranky. I said I would need to review them. The judge again asked if I had a job and went on about how it he couldn't understand why we couldn't settle and why would we waste 4 or 5 trips to court for this amount of money. (It is a lot to me). Ordered us back tomorrow at 2 pm. The atty said he probably couldn't attend but aomeone would be there. I feel like the judge calling me up 3x was pressure to cave. And tomorrows appearance is meant to make me see how inconvenient he can make things for me. What is my strategy with the affidavit - bill of sale? This is just preliminary conference.
  5. I told the atty prior to being called up that I was not willing to settle with out further discovery. The judge is asking me I I have a job. Do I like missing work. Etc. I feel intimidated and like I am getting on the judges bad side by not settling.
  6. I am feeling pressured by the judge to settle. He asked point blank if I ever had a chase card and did I "rack" up $xxxx. I answered that yes I had a chase card but did by know if this was the account or the amount. He asked if I was a legal transfer would I be willing to settle. I didn't know what to say so I said yes. How can I argue with a judge about what documents this atty may provide after the liinch break?
  7. Wow this is not going as I had hoped. A local attorney is filling in for the jdb the judge had ordered him to find proof of midlands ownership of the alleged debt. And have it emailed to the attys phone. How do I deal with this? We've had 2 calls.
  8. If the jdb atty does not show at this preliminary conference an I allowed to ask the judge to dismiss? Or does it need to be a written motion request? I can't read the civil laws on my phone.
  9. Hello, I posted in my old thread and got no responses so I posted as a new topic, sorry. This was what I asked: The JDB attorney filed for an RJI. They are stating breach of contract. I answered their interrogatories a while back but never requested anything of them. I really don't understand the whole process despite reading here and the CPLR's. I recently received a package of papers with the "Designation and Discovery Stipulation and Order - Standard Case" which seems to have nothing except one part relevant. I am attaching. Also was general "procedure" for the court - i think at least - it is confusing to me (also attached). A cover letter from the atty, says the stipulation & order must be filled out prior to the conference and that I should call them to discuss the stipulation. I have not had any contact with them at all. Do I need to call them? The "instructions" say to provide the court with "marked pleadings" and "bills of particulars". Does anyone have any tips on how to prepare myself for this conference. I really feel very nervous & unsure of my understanding of the basics in civil law.. The attachments are in my previous thread. http://www.creditinfocenter.com/community/topic/320105-in-ny-need-help-answering-plaintiffs-1st-set-of-interrogatories/ I am not sure what to expect at this PC. But would like to go in feeling I understand the process. If anyone can give some enlightenment, I would appreciately greatly.
  10. I am due to appear in a few days for my preliminary conference. The JDB attorney filed for an RJI. They are stating breach of contract. I answered their interrogatories a while back but never requested anything of them. I really don't understand the whole process despite reading here and the CPLR's. I recently received a package of papers with the "Designation and Discovery Stipulation and Order - Standard Case" which seems to have nothing except one part relevant. I am attaching. Also was general "procedure" for the court - i think at least - it is confusing to me (also attached). A cover letter from the atty, says the stipulation & order must be filled out prior to the conference and that I should call them to discuss the stipulation. I have not had any contact with them at all. Do I need to call them? The "instructions" say to provide the court with "marked pleadings" and "bills of particulars". Does anyone have any tips on how to prepare myself for this conference. I really feel very nervous & unsure of my understanding of the basics in civil law. Discovery stipulation and ordee-11262013171631.pdf General - Prelim conference-11262013171728.pdf
  11. I'm entering the next phase - Preliminary Conference coming up VERY SOON!! Should I make this a new topic for my questions?
  12. Why would the first statement in a complaint be??: Plaintiff is a Ohio Limited Liability Company What is my response to that? How would I know? I'm sure I could look it up, but what does that have to do with them suing me in NYS with a local lawyer?
  13. Thank you BV80 & usctrojanalum! So does my Cert of Service fall into the "under oath" area? The Court Clerk is of NO help at all, they are very rude actually. Rule 3133. Service of answers or objections to interrogatories. (a) Service of an answer or objection. Within twenty days after service of interrogatories, the party upon whom they are served shall serve upon each of the parties a copy of the answer to each interrogatory, except one to which the party objects, in which event the reasons for the objection shall be stated with reasonable particularity. ( Form of answers and objections to interrogatories. Interrogatories shall be answered in writing under oath by the party served, if an individual, or, if the party served is a corporation, a partnership or a sole proprietorship, by an officer, director, member, agent or employee having the information. Each question shall be answered separately and fully, and each answer shall be preceded by the question to which it responds. © Amended answers. Except with respect to amendment or supplementation of responses pursuant to subdivision (h) of section 3101, answers to interrogatories may be amended or supplemented only by order of the court upon motion.
  14. In NY STATE, not City, do I file my answers to Plaintiff's First Set of Interrogatories & Notice to Admit?? Also, as with my answers to complaint/summons I included a Certificate of Service, is that proper with these also? Can it hurt if I don't need to but file it anyway?