LAClipper

Members
  • Content Count

    46
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

6 Neutral

About LAClipper

  • Rank
    Advanced Member

Profile Fields

  • Location
    California

Recent Profile Visitors

658 profile views
  1. Hello Everyone, Just found out my partner has an old default judgement from a letter/forms we received from the Attorney Hunt and Enriques representing Portfolio Recovery and Associates. The letter includes an application to renew the judgment and the proof of service . The Default Judgement by the Clerk at the Court was entered on 03/20/2011 in Los Angeles, CA. I looked at the original court case and this is what shows on the website: Case Number: " " PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES LLC VS " " Filing Courthouse: Stanley Mosk Courthouse Filing Date: 12/20/2010 Case T
  2. I didn't realize that I typed that. Anyways yes it was a Dismissal without prejudice.
  3. Wells Fargo Dealer Services Repossesed my Car in Dec 2010 for missing 2 payments. I was sent a Notice of intent to sell property and in it it an option to Reinstate if I paid the remaining balance plus any fees added. So i Paid the amount owed in its totality and in a few days recovered my vehicle and later was sent the Pink Slip. Now this shows up on my Credit Report as a Repossession, even though I reinstated the contract. 1. What options do I have at this point to repair this account on my report? Account Name: WFDS/WDS ACCOUNT TYPE: Auto Loan Closed Experian shows as Paid was
  4. UPDATE: So i sent the CCP 96 to them and never received anything. I attended court on 4/10/2014 and I am glad to say that the case has been dismissed !! The JDB Lawyer never spoke to me and only spoke to the Judge before any cases were called for motions. I waited 15 minutes as 6 cases were Default Judgements due to not contesting to inadequate defenses. When he called my case the Judge said thank you for coming in the Lawyer has entered into this court the dismissal without prejudice as of 4/09/2014, this case is dismissed. And just like that it was done. I want to thank all those that
  5. Okay so the other party never responded to my Meet and confer Letter about Plaintiff's insufficient responses to Defendant's First Request For Production of Documents. I have been so busy and fallen behind on this case. Whats my next step. Do I sent the CCP 96 now?? What about the Meet and Confer Letter?? Court is soon on 4/10/2014.
  6. 1.I did use the form Disc- 015, and I will hold on to it till the day is closer to mailing it. Does it need to be CMRRR? 2.I found Seadragons 60 Day Checklist. It's in ASTmedic's Post, titled How I beat Midland in California. So much helpful info in that file. 3.For the Motion in Limine I will read up and get familiar with the process and draft it when I get the response to my CCP 96. Only evidence I have received so far has been the following: a) Verification from Chris Blanton on JDB responses to my request for Production of Documents. Verification from Chris Blanton on JDB responses t
  7. Okay so for now I will read up on Motions in Limine and I already have the CCP 96 drafted and ready to sent out when the time is near. So where is Seadragons 60 Day out Checklist at? I could not find it, any help in the right direction would be appreciated. Should I start Drafting the motion in limine, or wait till I receive their response first after I sent it to them?
  8. Hello Everyone, This case is about to go to trial in about 2 months and I have been soo busy. But anyways I have a question for you all, before I proceed. Unifund CCR Partners was the company Suing us and now on my Credit Report it doesn't show up at all. What happens now? How do I proceed?
  9. Just a small update, I failed to realize that their is a time frame for sending my meet and confer letter. What should I do now, should I still send it to them and hope they agree or what other steps can I take now?
  10. Updated Version for my Meet and Confer letter: I write to meet and confer about Plaintiff's insufficient responses to Defendant's First Request For Production of Documents. For your convenience, I set forth below each request, Plaintiff's response, and the reason a further response must be provided. Unless Plaintiff agrees in writing to supplement each response and grants defendant an extension of time to move to compel, Defendant will be forced to file a motion to compel further responses. Request No. 1: ALL DOCUMENTS relating to or constituting ANY signed Credit Card Application between
  11. 1) Are you suggesting I include these within each Objection or is the meet and confer letter solid. 2) Also I was sent the Responses to my RFPOD on February 26 2013, but they sent me the Original Verification of the JDB on March 15 2013. I believe Unverified Responses have no time limit for Motion to Compel. But for Verified Answers I know the deadline for Motion to Compel is 45 +5 if Mailed. When do I start the Countdown for the deadline and do weekends count? What happens if i miss the deadline?
  12. So here is my Draft, Please Suggest any changes. I write to meet and confer about Plaintiff's insufficient responses to Defendant's First Request For Production of Documents. For your convenience, I set forth below each request, Plaintiff's response, and the reason a further response must be provided. Unless Plaintiff agrees in writing to supplement each response and grants defendant an extension of time to move to compel, Defendant will be forced to file a motion to compel further responses. Request No. 1: ALL DOCUMENTS relating to or constituting ANY signed Credit Card Application bet
  13. So do I need to type two letters one for each or can they be combined? Also can you point me in the right direction to drafting the letter/s?
  14. I sent this Letter in January in regards to the BOP: Does it count as a meet and confer letter, or do I need to send them another for the production of Documents? This letter is to inform you that I consider the papers you served on XXXXXX, 2013, in response to my demand for a bill of particulars in the above action to be inadequate and defective because, 1. Your offices have failed to list each alleged service, its date, and its location for your Common Counts remedy to stand. 2. The failure to document that the debt was included in the prior assignment renders the "chain of assignment" f
  15. Update: April 30 2013 Well my case got transferred from LA Courthouse to Norwalk Courthouse on the 2nd of April 2013. I never received anything from the Lawyer regarding my Meet and Confer Letter, sent on January 2013. I did Finally Receive their responses to my RFPD and the FORM ROGGS. (A) Requests for Production of Documents 1. ALL DOCUMENTS relating to or constituting ANY signed Credit Application between defendant and CITIBANK SOUTH DAKOTA NA. Answer: This request is objected to on the grounds that it is overly broad, indefinite as to time, and without reasonable limitation in it