Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'discvery response vs discovery answer'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


  • Community Calendar


  • Announcements
    • PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING / Board Announcements
    • Resources
  • Credit Repair
    • Credit Repair
    • Collections
    • Credit Bureaus/Reports/Scores
    • Identity Theft
  • Legal Issues
    • Is There a Lawyer in the House
    • Bankruptcy Q and A
  • Debt Validation
    • While You are In It Debt Validation Q and A
    • Debt Settlement
  • Loans and Banking
    • Obtaining Credit Cards, Auto Loans and Financing
    • Mortgages
    • Student Loans
    • Banking and Finance
  • Non Credit
    • Off Topic

Find results in...

Find results that contain...

Date Created

  • Start


Last Updated

  • Start


Filter by number of...


  • Start







Found 1 result

  1. OH rules state that if an objection is made, the reason for the objection should be made in lieu of an answer. Should I give the cutoff dates and the date discovery was served by Plaintiff and received by Defendant? I put the objection after each request and each interrogatory....is that correct? EX: Request for Admission number1: Admit that your current balance owed is $1236.52/ Objection: Plaintiff's First Discovery (inclusive of all requests for admissions, all interrogatories and all requests for productions) is untimely; therefore an answer is unnecessarily. OR (give more detail) EX: Objection: Objection on the grounds that Plaintiff’s First Discovery (inclusive of all Requests for Admissions, all Interrogatories and all Requests for Production of Documents) is untimely: Plaintiff’s First Discovery was submitted to Defendant after the Court’s Scheduling Order cut-off date; therefore, an answer is unnecessary. Per the Court’s Scheduling Order, all discovery was to be submitted to opposing party or counsel by February 5, 2016 and answered by March 6, 2016: Per the Certificate of Service included with Plaintiff’s First Discovery, the aforementioned discovery was served to Defendant on March4, 2016: Defendant received Plaintiff’s First Discovery on March, 9, 2016. OR Objection: Defendant, generally objects to Plaintiff's First Discovery as untimely. All suggestions are appreciated. Thank you.
  • Create New...