Jump to content

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'FDCPA 1692e Debt Validation D'.

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Announcements
    • PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING / Board Announcements
    • Cosmetic Changes to the Forum
    • Resources
  • Credit Repair
    • Credit Repair
    • Collections
    • Credit Bureaus/Reports/Scores
    • Identity Theft
  • Legal Issues
    • Is There a Lawyer in the House
    • Bankruptcy Q and A
  • Debt Validation
    • While You are In It Debt Validation Q and A
    • Debt Settlement
  • Loans and Banking
    • Obtaining Credit Cards, Auto Loans and Financing
    • Mortgages
    • Student Loans
    • Banking and Finance
  • Non Credit
    • Off Topic

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


Location


Biography


Interests


Occupation

Found 1 result

  1. www.michbar.org/consumer/pdfs/ap08.pdf 15 USC 1692e(8) specifi cally provides that it is a violation to communicate “to any person credit information which is known or which should be known to be false, including the failure to communicate that a disputed debt is disputed.” Magrin v Unifund CCR Partners, Inc 9th Circuit Under 15 U.S.C. § 1692e, a debt collector violates the Act if it uses “any false, deceptive, or misleading representation or means in connection with the collection of any debt.” This prohibition includes false representations as to “the character, amount, or legal status of any debt.” 15 U.S.C. § 1692e(1)(A). Thus, a consumer states a valid claim for relief under the Act when he alleges that a debt collector has made false representations as to the legal status of a debt in connection with the sale, transfer or assignment of a debt to another debt collector, with the knowledge that the purchaser, transferee or assignee intends to initiate or continue at tempts to collect the debt. Burdick v Palisades Collection LLC The court denied LVNV’s motion to dismiss the FDCPA claim, holding that the consumer stated a claim against LVNV because the debt collector “failed to disclose that the debt was disputed when it assigned the account to other debt collectors and sold the debt. Kinel v Sherman Acquisition II, LP, The court refused to dismiss the FDCPA claims against Wolpoff & Abramson, LLP, (W&A), one of the nation’s largest debt collector law firms. It held that a jury could reasonably find that W&A’s communications to the Sherman defendants were false or deceptive by virtue of its failure to state that consumer’s debt was disputed.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.