Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'Oklahoma'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Announcements
    • Polls
    • PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING / Board Announcements
    • Resources
  • Credit Repair Forums
    • Credit Repair
    • Collections
    • Credit Bureaus/Reports/Scores
    • Credit Article of the Week
  • Legal Issues
    • Is There a Lawyer in the House
    • Bankruptcy Q and A
  • Debt Validation
    • While You are In It Debt Validation Q and A
    • Debt Settlement
  • Loans and Banking
    • Obtaining Credit Cards, Auto Loans and Financing
    • Mortgages
    • Student Loans
    • Banking and Finance
  • Non Credit
    • Off Topic
    • Wine

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


Location


Biography


Interests


Occupation

Found 7 results

  1. I had a Judgment against me in mid-2011, and it was whatever you call it when they take the full amount from your bank account. (I'm not going to go into how BS it was that it happened, but get to the point.) I've pulled my credit report before and had seen it on there, showing there was a Judgment. (There has never been a "status" area.) Yesterday, I was talking with a CC company I have one with because was denied an increase. I inquired why that was and the lady went over some negative things and said it was probably primarily because I still have a Judgment against me. I asked did she mean "have", as in shows it was paid (cuz they literally took the money) or did she mean to say "had", as in there was a Judgment and that basically affects my credit. She said neither. It was an active Judgment and did not show it was ever paid; it was unresolved and "active". She informed me that the Plaintiff/Debtor/Winner-Of-My-Monies is supposed to file with the courts that it was paid in full. And that my credit has probably not been that good for the past 4 years, because of that. After freaking out/raging, I called the law firm (Scott Lowery) and asked about it. The lady (secretary?) looked and said something along the lines of, "That's weird. It's not that they didn't send the courts anything, they never even filled anything out about it. That is the end of your file. It just shows that the judgment was granted and they got the funds. I'm sorry. That definitely should not have happened. I'll get an attorney to send you via email and post that it was paid in full/satisfaction of judgment on the date that it was." So, I got an email, of the scanned document, for the Satisfaction of Judgment and it showing the date it was paid in full. They said they'd send it to the 3 credit bureaus (but I'm going to also). I've looked it up online, and it mentions penalties if they do not, but not for my state of Oklahoma; I either get NY & IA or "depending on the state..." 4 years of it effecting my credit, and I'm sure it's exponential, as it's been showing no activity! My question is, surely there is something that can be done to them?
  2. 1. Who is the named plaintiff in the suit? Spouse 2. What is the name of the law firm handling the suit? (should be listed at the top of the complaint.) Love, Beal, & Nixon 3. How much are you being sued for? $2,715.86 plus fees 4. Who is the original creditor? (if not the Plaintiff) Dell Financial Services / Webbank 5. How do you know you are being sued? (You were served, right?) Summons 6. How were you served? (Mail, In person, Notice on door) Person Delivered Summons 7. Was the service legal as required by your state? Yes 8. What was your correspondence (if any) with the people suing you before you think you were being sued? rec'd 2 letters, ignored 9. What state and county do you live in? Oklahoma 10. When is the last time you paid on this account? (looking to establish if you are outside of the statute of limitations) Unknown, Webbank/Dell does not show on Experian, Equifax required written report request, Transunion blew up while attempting to print report, can't pull again. 11. What is the SOL on the debt? To find out: 3 years on open accounts, 5 years on written. This forum and other personal contact seems to indicate 5 years for credit accounts. 12. What is the status of your case? Suit served? Motions filed? You can find this by a) calling the court or looking it up online (many states have this information posted - when you find the online court site, search by case number or your name). Petition filed and certified by court clerk on June 29, 2012. Served on July 8, 2012. No answer submitted yet. 13. Have you disputed the debt with the credit bureaus (both the original creditor and the collection agency?)No 14. Did you request debt validation before the suit was filed? Note: if you haven't sent a debt validation request, don't bother doing this now - it's too late.No 15. How long do you have to respond to the suit? (This should be in your paperwork). If you don't respond to the lawsuit notice you will lose automatically. In 99% of the cases, they will require you to answer the summons, and each point they are claiming. We need to know what the "charges" are. Please post what they are claiming. Did you receive an interrogatory (questionnaire) regarding the lawsuit?Answer due to court within 35 days after service of this summons upon you exclusive of the day of service? 16. What evidence did they send with the summons? An affidavit? Statements from the OC? Contract? List anything else they attached as exhibits. None 17. Read this article: Read it. I was served a 3 page document notarized and signed by the court clerk on June 29, 2012. On July 8, 2012 I recieved the summons by courier? at my house. This document does not look like any of the previous summons that I've seen on these forums. It's very odd. [page 1] IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF <COUNTY> COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, ) PLAINTIFF ) ) No. <Court Case No.> vs. ) ) <SPOUSE>, ) DEFENDANT. ) SUMMONS To the below-named Defendant: Name: Address: Wife's Name Our street City: Our City State: Oklahoma Zip Code: Our Zip Home Phone: My home phone "You have been sued by the above-named plaintiff, and you are directed to file a written answer to the attached petition in the office of the court clerk of <COUNTY> County located at <address>, within thirty-five (35) days after service of this summons upon you exclusive of the day of service. Within the same time, a copy of your Answer must be delivered or mailed to the attorney for the Plaintiff. Failure to respond , in writing, within thirty-five (35) days, will result in default judgment being entered against you." BOLD: "No request will be made to the Court for a Judgment in this case until the expiration of 35 days after you receipt of this Petition and Summons. If you dispute the debt and/or request the name and address of the original creditor in writing within the 35-day period that begins with receipt of the Petition and Summons, all collection efforts, including our proceedings with this lawsuit, will cease until we respond as required by law." Issued this 29 day of June, 2012 Court Clerk By <signature> Deputy Court Clerk Love, Beal & Nixon, PC Attorneys for Plaintiff <Address> This summons was served on the 8 day of July, 2012 [Handwriting is atrocious: 8 is barely legible, 2 is supposed to represent July and \ is 2012...]. YOU MAY SEEK THE ADVICE OF AN ATTORNEY ON ANY SUCH MATTER CONNECTED WITH THIS SUIT OR YOUR ANSWER. SUCH ATTORNEY SHOULD BE CONSULTED IMMEDIATELY SO THAT AN ANSWER MAY BE FILED WITHIN THE TIME STATED IN THE SUMMONS. [page 2] June 26, 2012 <law firm's case no.> IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF <COUNTY> COUNTY STATE OF OKLAHOMA MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, ) PLAINTIFF ) ) No. <Court Case No.> vs. ) ) <SPOUSE>, ) DEFENDANT. ) PETITION FOR INDEBTEDNESS COMES NOW the Plaintiff and for cause of action against the Defendant alleges and states: 1. Unless you, within 30 days after recept of this notice, dispute the validity of the debt, or any portion thereof, we wil assume the debt to be valid. If you notify this law fir, Love, Beal & Nixon, P.C., in writing, within the 30 day perioud, that the debt, or any portion thereof, is disputed, our law firm, Love, Beal & Nixon, P.C., will also provide you with the name and address of the original creditor, if different from the current creditor. This is a communication from a debt collector. This communication is an attempt to collect a debt and any information obtained from this communication will be used for that purpose. 2. Webbank/ Dell Financial Services LLC, provided credit to the defendant on a written credit card account with an account number of XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX4723. At the time of charge off, the balance was $2,715.86. The indebtedness of arising therefrom has been duly assigned to MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, , plaintiff herein. The Defendant defaulted on the obligations required under contract. 3. After all applicable credits, the defendant remains indebted to the plaintiff in the amount of $2,715.86. [page 3] WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against the Defendant in the sum of $2,715.86, with interest at the statutory rate fromthe date of judgment, all court costs, and a reasonable attorney's fee, and for such other and further relief as to this Court may seem aquitable, just and proper. <signature> bunch of names and #numbers ATTORNEY'S LIEN CLAIMED ---------------------------------------------
  3. I was looking to see what legal requirements were necessary for a Bill of Sale to be binding. It took a bit of digging, but I found this from O.S. 12A Uniform Commercial Code if I am reading this right, this supports the argument that a Bill of Sale must specifically identify the "rights" being transferred. That any Bill of Sale lacking such information is in fact invalid. Is this correct? §12A-1-9-619. Transfer of record or legal title.TRANSFER OF RECORD OR LEGAL TITLE (a) In this section, “transfer statement” means a record authenticated by a secured party stating: (1) that the debtor has defaulted in connection with an obligation secured by specified collateral; (2) that the secured party has exercised its post-default remedies with respect to the collateral; (3) that, by reason of the exercise, a transferee has acquired the rights of the debtor in the collateral; and (4) the name and mailing address of the secured party, debtor, and transferee. ( A transfer statement entitles the transferee to the transfer of record of all rights of the debtor in the collateral specified in the statement in any official filing, recording, registration, or certificate-of-title system covering the collateral. If a transfer statement is presented with the applicable fee and request form to the official or office responsible for maintaining the system, the official or office shall: (1) accept the transfer statement; (2) promptly amend its records to reflect the transfer; and (3) if applicable, issue a new appropriate certificate of title in the name of the transferee. © A transfer of the record or legal title to collateral to a secured party under subsection ( of this section or otherwise is not of itself a disposition of collateral under this article and does not of itself relieve the secured party of its duties under this article. Added by Laws 2000, c. 371, § 126, eff. July 1, 2001.
  4. Very interesting on how quick cash places sue you http://www.cwebnews.com/business-news/finance/265747-when-lenders-sue-quick-cash-can-turn-into-a-lifetime-of-debt.html
  5. avoiding all puns about putrid clothing, this case was initiated last year this month and no communication or action has taken place since my response to interogatories in Sept 2012. The question now is how long can this remain on the books without any action before I can file a motion to dismiss, and what technical grounds do I cite for the dismissal. I've read through the Oklahoma laws on civil procedures, but there is no mention of dismissal based on inactivity. http://www.creditinfocenter.com/community/topic/315007-midland-lbn-and-petition-for-indebtedness/
  6. Hi, I know there is some confusion to the OK SOL and depending on the judge how they will rule if a CC debt is account stated/written/oral/open ended. I was wondering if the laws changed after the default would the old laws be in effect? and does anyone have any good arguments or case law on account stated? I've been browsing cases through OSCN, justia, google scholar, etc and i'm just not coming up with anything very helpful for the state of Oklahoma (or in favor of the defendant anyways) Thank you in advance for any input.
  7. First, let me say thank you for all the helpful posts I've read here over the years. It's been almost two years since I've had to deal with any of this, but now find myself needing some advice again. Between 2-4 years back, I settled on nearly $75,000 in debt for just under $15,000. All but one OC worked with me. One debt, from GE Money Bank (which I'm not even sure was mine and may have belonged to my ex-wife, but was reported under my name) was my biggest problem. Funny thing is, it was one of my smallest debts, at under $5,000. GE Money Bank wouldn't work with me to settle and then sent account to Midland Funding, via Love Beal & Nixon. Multiple attempts to validate the debt were met with bogus and non-specific information. I got scared and almost ended up in BK, after getting the notice of lawsuit. That's when I got serious and ran across these forums. Your help and guidance completely changed my attitude and confidence. I fought back and responded to everything they sent me, filing paperwork in the courthouse several times. The waiting game was intense. About a week before my court date, I received a Dismissal Without Prejudice. I was happy with that because at least I could breathe for a while. However, nearly two years later, I'm finding that Dismissal Without Prejudice is not enough. I live in Oklahoma County, OK. I did a deed in lieu of foreclosure on my house nearly 4 years ago (lost job, divorce, all the major sob story points). The house sold about a year later and now I'm eligible to buy a house again (as of last December). Good news, but with all my credit blemishes, this one is standing out as the biggest red flag. I still have a decent overall score of 670, which isn't bad, but all the other dings are adding up. I really need to have this removed from my credit report. So, back to Dismissal Without Prejudice. I received the Dismissal Without Prejudice in Spring 2011, nearly 2 years ago. Can I file a Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice now? Or is that case closed and I'd have to open a new case? I believe that I'm passed the original statute of limitations for this account. My credit report says that my last payment for the OC was October 2009. State of Oklahoma is 3 years for non-written contract and I can't imagine they could produce a written contract. Even so, I think that if I could simply file a Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice on the same case, that would be simple enough. I worked with my bank to request that the debt be validated or removed. However, they told me today that Midland has placed a "Cease & Desist" on the entry and it can't be changed without the "Cease & Desist" being removed first. Is that even possible? I called Midland and asked why the C&D was there and they told me that I had requested the C&D in writing. That's not exactly true. I requested they C&D calling me, unless they could provide adequate documentation, proving the alleged debt was actually mine. They are using the C&D for personal contact to create vexatious litigation against my credit report. My first inclination is to write Midland directly requesting, yet again, a validation, and if they can't produce the validation, to immediately remove the credit agency report. Or, of course, if I'm allowed to file a Motion to Dismiss with Prejudice, that would be easy and I doubt they'd even pick up a finger after the reams of paperwork I requested the first go-round. Any ideas or thoughts? Thank you from the bottom of my heart for your help! Burci