Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'rule 56'.
Found 1 result
-
I just received a Motion for Summary Judgement for Audit and Adjustment Company in King County here in Washington State. The MSJ is being filed under Rule 56. It looks like it was filed 9/19 and I just received it a couple of days ago in the mail. The date of the hearing is this Tuesday, 10/7. I was not served, and there is no complaint. The plaintiff was kind enough to send me a copy of rule 56. They have also attached some copies of what appear to be past statements and a declaration of assignor in support of plaintiff's MSJ. That was signed on 12/30/13 and looks like it was signed by someone at the OC. There's also another assignment attached that looks more like a letter signed on 2/5/13, but I don't know who signed it as there signature is unreadable, and no other fields are printed. I haven't handled this type of thing before. I'm using to filing an answer, etc. So I'm a little stumped, and frustrated by zero lack of time to respond. I feel like I need to turn something in tomorrow to be timely. Can I respond to the MSJ and object to it because of lack of time for discovery? I'm not sure what other defenses or objections are appropriate. Any feedback you have is appreciated.
