Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'van slyke'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • Announcements
    • Polls
    • PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING / Board Announcements
    • Resources
  • Credit Repair Forums
    • Credit Repair
    • Collections
    • Credit Bureaus/Reports/Scores
    • Credit Article of the Week
  • Legal Issues
    • Is There a Lawyer in the House
    • Bankruptcy Q and A
  • Debt Validation
    • While You are In It Debt Validation Q and A
    • Debt Settlement
  • Loans and Banking
    • Obtaining Credit Cards, Auto Loans and Financing
    • Mortgages
    • Student Loans
    • Banking and Finance
  • Non Credit
    • Off Topic
    • Wine

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


Location


Biography


Interests


Occupation

Found 1 result

  1. I've been singularly engrossed in academic work since the beginning of the year. So it was just yesterday that I read the AZ div1 CoA memorandum decision on Midland v Van Slyke (CV 14-0851). Has there been any prior discussion of this decision on this forum since the issuance of the ruling on Feb 25th? I couldn't turn anything up either in a forum search or by way of a site specific google search. The decision is unpublished and creates not binding precedent but only persuasive authority (Slyke's counsel has since requested the publishing of the ruling). I'm thinking about the decision's impact (as persuasive authority) on RoE 803(6) and Parker, as applicable specifically to these sorts of cases. But I don't want to drone on about it in a new thread here if others already discussed it months ago. If there has been any prior discussion on the forum here about this decision I'd be grateful if someone would be kind enough to point me to it.