nebulastar Posted July 31, 2003 Report Share Posted July 31, 2003 We were sent a signed copy of our rental lease as DV from CA. They highlighted the clause which states that the landlord may collect fees if tenant defaults on lease. There was a typed letter from the OC listing a lump sum fee of $XXX for "collection fees". We sent them another letter requesting a itemized bill of the collection fees. They once again sent a copy of the lease with the same clause highlighted. Do we send another letter requesting info again? Also do they have to prove that the apartment was rerented on the date they claim? We know that this will have to be paid eventually but we just can't do it now so we are trying to stall for the time being. I am confused as to what constitutes proper DV. I have read posts in several forums regarding this. Some have stated that you should ask for proof that the CA has either purchased or been assigned the debt. I have also read the fact that they have info regarding the account is proof. I have also read that the CA isn't obligated to supply the debtor with their agreement with OC. Thanks in advance for any help given Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
admin Posted July 31, 2003 Report Share Posted July 31, 2003 Yes, you send them another letter, then wait 15 days before serving them the lawsuit if you want to go all the way with this.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts