wranglertj Posted August 5, 2003 Report Share Posted August 5, 2003 Got this from edcombs.com:http://www.edcombs.com/CM/News/news7.aspin the section immediately after the OVERSHADOWING section, which is also pretty darn good.OTHER §1692g VIOLATIONS Where the validation notice is placed on the back of the correspondence, without a legible and reasonably prominent reference on the front, §1692g is violated. However, the enclosure of a separate 8-1/2 x 11" validation notice in the same envelope has been found to be acceptableEvidently, if the 30 day notation is not on the front or referenced large enough for "least sophisticated debtor." to understand, it could be construed as a violation. This whole section on this site about the FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT UPDATE -- 1999 * case laws referenced and everything is worth the reading. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sisflomi Posted August 8, 2003 Report Share Posted August 8, 2003 Asset is good for doing this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts