Jump to content

Verified wrong info


Hunter
 Share

Recommended Posts

I noticed on my EQ CR, that an old car loan still showed open with a balance and past due amount. I disputed with EQ and it came back verified (with a new DOLA, was 12/96, now 6/97). I then called the OC and they faxed me a letter stating the date and amount of payoff (Jan. 97). I faxed EQ a dispute letter with the letter from the OC and a copy of the check I sent them. Today I received my updated CR, they fixed the balance and past due amount but, not the DOLA. Am I wrong in thinking that it should be Jan 97? I am in the process of writing another letter to send EQ, but I don't want to look stupid if June 97 is correct. Thanks everyone and happy new year!! Oh, and it goes to show how "great" that verification process works!

Hunter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the response Pammila. Actually I do want to get rid of it. It has quite a few lates on it (that they updated too, nice of them). I have spoken to the OC again, the rep said that I was right, the DOLA was Jan 97, but to have it corrected I need to conact their rreserach department and they may be able to fix it. It just seems with the proof, there shouldn't be any questions. Is there anything special I should include in the letter?

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote>Originally posted by Hunter

Thanks for the response Pammila. Actually I do want to get rid of it. It has quite a few lates on it (that they updated too, nice of them). I have spoken to the OC again, the rep said that I was right, the DOLA was Jan 97, but to have it corrected I need to conact their rreserach department and they may be able to fix it. It just seems with the proof, there shouldn't be any questions. Is there anything special I should include in the letter?

Thanks!

</blockquote>

I would send them a GOODWILL letter asking them to delete the late pays or to delete the tradeline altogether. Pammila is right that you would want it to remain if it is not negative. You've already tried disputing it, so I would go this way now.

:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.