Leadhead Posted July 26, 2004 Report Share Posted July 26, 2004 I'm the plaintiff in a suit against a CRA. The defendant seems to be dragging their feet (expected this). Would it be effective to file a motion for a scheduling conference to get things moving? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdouglaslee Posted July 26, 2004 Report Share Posted July 26, 2004 I'm the plaintiff in a suit against a CRA. The defendant seems to be dragging their feet (expected this). Would it be effective to file a motion for a scheduling conference to get things moving?That would depend on the court and why they are dragging. If they haven't answered your complaint and haven't filed a motion for extension of time then you should be filing a motion for default judgment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leadhead Posted July 26, 2004 Author Report Share Posted July 26, 2004 I'm the plaintiff in a suit against a CRA. The defendant seems to be dragging their feet (expected this). Would it be effective to file a motion for a scheduling conference to get things moving?That would depend on the court and why they are dragging. If they haven't answered your complaint and haven't filed a motion for extension of time then you should be filing a motion for default judgment.Sorry...should've given more info. I won a default judgment in SCC against the CRA. They appealed, getting a whole new trial since SCC isn't a court of record. They didn't really 'answer' the complaint. All they filed in SCC was a Sworn Denial. They didn't show on the hearing date, so I won. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts