DBMCC Posted July 29, 2004 Report Share Posted July 29, 2004 I recently had a default judgement removed but a new trial was ordered for 9/7/04. Although there is obviosly no evidence to show that I owe the JDB, I think they will still pursue this thing in court. Do I make contact with them and request what info they are planning to use at the trial?? I am just confused as to what I need to do besides showup next month. The other thing is that it appears that they were never actually entitled to collect on this debt. They have already taken me for about $1500 after seizing my car. How do I go about pursuing that money. Also should I wait to inform the CRA that the judgement has been removed until after trial on 9/7?? Any suggestion would be most appreciated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBMCC Posted July 30, 2004 Author Report Share Posted July 30, 2004 I got the info on what to do during the discovery and such...but no info on if as the defendant I am allowed to start this process... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
admin Posted July 30, 2004 Report Share Posted July 30, 2004 I'm assuming they sent you no interrogatories yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recovering Attorney Posted July 30, 2004 Report Share Posted July 30, 2004 It is the defendant who controls and makes the most of discvovery. After all, you are the one being sued and you need to see what the plaintiff has ahead of time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DBMCC Posted July 30, 2004 Author Report Share Posted July 30, 2004 No interrogatories as of yet.....default was removed almost two weeks ago and notice of new trial went out on that day. The clerk put a note in the case indicating that the trial can not be re-scheduled by the JDB. If they had interrogatories would they have likely sent them by now?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leadhead Posted July 30, 2004 Report Share Posted July 30, 2004 It is the defendant who controls and makes the most of discvovery. After all, you are the one being sued and you need to see what the plaintiff has ahead of time.I'm the plaintiff in a suit against a CRA and the defendant hasn't sent one bit of discovery my way. I, however, have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leadhead Posted July 30, 2004 Report Share Posted July 30, 2004 It is the defendant who controls and makes the most of discvovery. After all, you are the one being sued and you need to see what the plaintiff has ahead of time.I'm the plaintiff in a suit against a CRA and the defendant hasn't sent one bit of discovery my way. I, however, have. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts