validation and C&D ignored

[agn140]

C&D was included with my validation request, however, they continue to call after the signing date. Can anyone post a good ITS letter and also all things being equal would you sue for violations in small claims court. It would seem to me that even if a small claims judge was not that experienced in these kind of cases, if the statute and laws pertaining to these issues were quoted or shown to the judge with the pertinant parts highlighted that should be sufficient for the judge to rule.

Your comments would be appreciated.

Also anyones sample ITS letter.

[DocPC]

Is this the CA or the OC?

[agn140]

this was the CA

[Recovering Attorney]

Simply write them:

RE: Your file No:

Your client:

Dear so and so

This letter signifies my intent to sue your company for violating my rights under the FDCPA.

By letter dated xx/xx/2004 I asked you to stop calling me about this alleged debt. You recieved this letter on xx/xx/2004. However, you have continued to harass me by phone. This violates Section 805© of the FDCPA. Your company and the individual callers will be held liable for this violation. As you know, this may include a statutory penalty of up to $1000 and attorney's fees.

I reiterate that I DISPUTE this debt.

To avoid this, please:

1. stop calling me

2. Delete this item from any credit reporting agency you may have reported it to;

3. Send me a check for $500.00, no later than xx/xx/2004.

If you fail to do this, I will bring action to enforce my rights.

[Josh Mcgrath]

hey, Recovery Attorney,

you probably know but, every CA I have gotten a check from (without the court) was for 1000 bucks. So why put the 500 bucks? I have had very strong cases though. (recorded conversations(