Jump to content

Question for DocDon


confused1
 Share

Recommended Posts

It's really hard to say. A lot of it also depends on who opens the letter, and their mood for that day.

I don't think it would so much the amount as it would be the stipulation that they remove the negative info (if you included it). Either way, Discover is usually pretty good about responding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

So today, I received a letter, no letterhead, no date, no reference/acct. number, nothing except an address. It says I should call this number because there is a voice message waiting for me and I won't be talking to be a live operator. On the bottom of the letter, it has that saying "this is attempt to collect a debt." So I call and this message says that I need to contact the CA HQ's within 72 hours to settle my debt. So far, I've received nothing from the OC and the CA hasn't validated the debt. They've received the letters CMRRR on 12/3.

The DV letter to the CA included the statement that they only contact me by mail. I really don't want to call them per advice from here. What should I do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But doesn't the DV letter prohibit them from calling me? Isn't this second letter a violation?

I got some advice from another forum and I was told that sending the letter to the OC and DVing the CA was a bad move on my part. I haven't heard from the OC nor received anything from the CA.

What should I do now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Its still the same CA. The message told me to call the CA's HQ's and left a number. I went on the CA's website and the numbers matched. The OC hasn't contacted me at all.

I was told to send a verification letter to the OC and a second validation letter to the CA. Would that be wise since I already sent the OC a settlement offer saying that the debt is mine? If I'm asking them to verify, didn't I do that for them when I sent the settlement offer?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You have a green card that shows they signed for the DV. They spit all over the FDCPA and continued collections.

Next step is to report the CA to the FTC and their state Attorney General. Then you can, if you so desire, go after the CA for your civial damages under the FDCPA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Should I report the CA to the HQ's state AG or the office that has been contacting me? Their HQ is in IL and the office that has been contacting me is in AZ.

"I was told to send a verification letter to the OC and a second validation letter to the CA. Would that be wise since I already sent the OC a settlement offer saying that the debt is mine? If I'm asking them to verify, didn't I do that for them when I sent the settlement offer?"

Now what should I do about the OC?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Should I report the CA to the HQ's state AG or the office that has been contacting me? Their HQ is in IL and the office that has been contacting me is in AZ.

Headquarters.

"I was told to send a verification letter to the OC and a second validation letter to the CA. Would that be wise since I already sent the OC a settlement offer saying that the debt is mine? If I'm asking them to verify, didn't I do that for them when I sent the settlement offer?"

Now what should I do about the OC?

Believe it or not, a lot of people simply "settle" because they don't need the added hassle of a CA hounding them. They don't even know what it is they're settling, and their paying is really not an admission to anything except they just want the issue done and over with.

So, you've really said nothing more to the OC than you simply don't have the time to pursue this matter and just want them to go away.

Here's what I would do. You'll have to decide if this right for you:

I would put on my poker face. Discover tends sue happy, so I might as well try to take the upper hand early. Courts are holding the OC's liable for the actions of their contracted CA's... right now it's mainly for repo agencies (who are considered CA's in many states), but it's only a matter of time before someone successfully argues the issue to involve credit cards.... so I would mention to Discover that they are liable for the actions of the CA who refuses to provide you with proper validation, and continues to violate your rights under the FDCPA. As such, the matter has been forwarded to the FTC and the appropriate State Attorney General for further processing.

Just my opinion....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So what you're saying is that I should send the OC another letter, saying that their CA has violated the FDCPA by continued collection activity. Is there a sample I could use?In this letter, should I send another settlement offer? Should I ask for PFD instead of Paid as Agreed which was stated in the original offer?

If the CA sends back the debt to the OC (which I've heard they've done when they received DV letters), can't the OC come back and say, "wait a sec, its verified, see I have this settlement letter from consumer, don't settle for anything less than full amt." Can they do that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So should send another goodwill letter to the OC and include the following:

- they're liable for their CA violating FDCPA

- let them know that the CA actions have been reported to the FTC and their AG office

- settlement offer for PFD instead of PAA

If yes, would it be bad on my CR if the TL on this OC is my oldest TL on my report and its deleted? (if they were to agree of course)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not going to be a "goodwill" letter by definition.... you're trying to get them to assess the legal ramifications of the situation. Let them respond to you with an offer. Don't suggest one.... you can always counter-offer.

They don't know what cards you're holding..... :wink:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're not sending them a goodwill letter if you go my route. You're telling them they walked onto thin ice, and then wait for their response. If you send out a nice goodwill letter and a "you screwed up" letter, they'll think you're bipolar....

It's one letter or the other. Not both.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I'm gonna wait for their response from my first letter. Maybe I'm confusing you by calling my settlement offer (first letter) my goodwill letter. Once I hear from them, then I send the other letter (your route) to let them know about the violations, since it happened after the letter was sent out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.