Jump to content

Tekcollect said no PFD after accepting of $3800 from me


DebbieCares
 Share

Recommended Posts

I paid these clowns over $3800 only because I have a closing in November for a home.

This is what the letter said the OC and CA signed.

This letter is an offer to amicably settle the above accounts. It is not to be construed as an acknowledgement of my liability for these debts in any form.

I will pay your company the amount of $3,827.82 as full settlement of these accounts.

If you accept this agreement, I will send you a cashier check for the full settlement amount of $3,827.82 in exchange for a full deletion of all references from both TekCollect and Tennessee Teachers Credit Union regarding these accounts from my credit profile with all national Credit Reporting Agencies and full satisfaction of these debts. You agree these accounts can never be sold or assigned to anyone nor can they be reported to any credit bureau in the future. This agreement is binding.

If you agree to the above, please acknowledge with your signatures and return a copy to me. Upon receipt of this signed binding agreement, I will promptly send you a cashier check in the amount stated above.

After receiving signatures from them both I overnighted a cashier check which they have received.

Now the guy says no deletion, only Paid in full update

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Simple.

You have a signed binding agreement. They are now refusing to follow the terms of that agreement after receiving payment. Sue them.

Because of the agreement any reporting done after payment that is not in compliance with the agreement is false reporting and breach of contract. Pay a lawyer to send letters to those clowns and it will probably get taken care of quickly. The CRAs are unlikely to be helpful unless you get a hold of someone above the typical phone-monkey.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

many ppl telling me not to send letter to CRA's or it will be cemented forever as paid in full.

I have contacted a lawyer but time is of the essence as closing is November and this is probably a long battle.

moral of the story is this CA's are scumbags, and PFD's are very risky indeed

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, sending the agreement to the CRA's only gives proof that is it is a PFD agreement, which is against CRA policy. They probably aren't going to be much help.

You DO have specific avenues to nail the OC/CA or whomever accepted the agreement. It isn't like a restrictive endorsement or anything. They took the check, which is a defacto agreement of the terms. If they didn't want to agree, they should have sent the check back.

You have at least $3800 in damages, and now that you have your home, they can't extort payment out of you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have contacted a lawyer but time is of the essence as closing is November and this is probably a long battle.

I honestly don't think it IS going to be a long battle. Especially since you have a signed contract stating the agreement. You make a note of this to the CEO of these companies...they won't want to mess with it. It's a straight-forward win and they'll know it.

Shove this in a higher-up's face. They'll not want to deal with you....and it won't take 4 months.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Next time, put a time limit on it. Give them XX amount of days to have it off your report by or they owe you $XXXX. We all know they have contacts at the bureaus, so they can do it in an hour if they choose. Make it something reasonable, like 5 business days.

On to the point at hand: Send a letter to the highest rung on the ladder at both the CA and OC along with a filled-out, ready to go lawsuit. That should take care of it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Make sure the you and/or your lawyer includes the director of the CA as an individual. And stop talking to them on the phone unless you're going to get it on tape. They'll delete when you file suit. Make sure you send copies to all 3 credit bureaus, the FTC, your state attorney general and their state attorney general. Do that last part now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's true that they dont' like them, but it wont' get you in any kind of trouble. It's to cover your a$$ in case you need to take on the CRA at some point, so they can't say they didn't know. The bottom line on that is there was an agreement made and they are now going back on their end. They most assuredly are not going to want to FTC and the AG's to know. They have the power to do something to them. Oh, and lastly, check to see who else they have to answer to. Make sure that they are registered/licensed/bonded to do business in your/their state. See if there is another regulatory board to complain to (One CA had like 6 offices for me to complain to, it was LOVELY). Take this weekend to find out who all these people are, write up all the complaints and send them out-CMRRR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the cra doesnt like pfd's why send it to em, they will say uh no way

They may not like them but this is when to use the CRAs bull crap against them. The CRAs claim they are only responsible for parroting what the furnishers tell them, so if the furnisher tells them to delete they really have no say in the matter without admitting that they in fact do not parrot the furnisher.

They can't have it both ways.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Have I mentioned that I actually have an Equifax employee ON TAPE admitting that they parrot what the furnishers tell them? In fact, she said that they MAKE SURE that what the furnisher have in their records and what they put on your report matches....Oh, one sweet day, one sweet day...

P.S. Debbie, forget taking a trip unless it's to file your Federal case. Seriously. If you can't afford an attorney, get help here on how to file it yourself. Go check your state's and the Federal Code of Civil Procedure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can understand your frustration. Trust me, I've been scr*ewed by both CA's and CRA's. But in the end, you'll end up with more than enough to pay for a pool for your hew home. I dont'knwo wht state you're in , but you could og the small claims route. (I know a lot of people here dont' agree, but I've sued successfully there and when i actually had to go to court, I won). Youv'e got a slam dunk case.

Another way to go is contacting the CEO/President of the OC and seeing what they have to say. Most of them fold when they see that you're a smart consumer. Let them know that if they dont' delete, you'll add them to the suit. Make sure you get your complaints out. These CA's do NOT want the FTC and the AG poking their noses into their business. They will answer the complaint in 30 days or less. Make sure you send them copies of everything for their records. I implore you, complaints DO help. The Ag's, especially. They have the powere to file suit on the CA's and OC's. They will make their lives a living hell. Look up Mike Hatch, you'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You should not have to pay for a lawyer to represent you. This case is open-shut. Since the FCRA allows the attorney to take his fees directly from the CA and the CRA, you should get representation on contingency. You don't pay a penny.

Second, since you would have attorney representation, you arenot limited to small claims court. In Circuit Court and up you would, in addition to monetary damages, get injunctive releif (a court order telling them they must correct it).

Go to www.edcombs.com get their fax number. Fax over all your docs including the signed agreement with a cover letter explaining the problem. If they do not take it on themselves, they will likely turn it over to an affiliate lawyer in your area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.