Sign in to follow this  
Madmanmike

more confused

Recommended Posts

(((No. Validation is nothing more than showing that the CA is collecting the same amount they were contracted for. Chaudry v. Gallerizo and Stonehart v. Rosenthal. )))))

got that caption form another post. In Debt validation with a CA the only thing they have to prove is that they are collecting the same ammount they were contracted for?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No, not true. That isn't ALL that the Chaundry ruling said. They must provide some evidence of the debt, but it doesn't rise to the level of discovery.

For example billing statements that account for the debt, but they don't have to have fingerprints and a handwriting expert to prove beyond the shadow of a doubt that the billing statements are yours and you signed it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply. Your posts always seem to make more sense to me. On here there are few differing opinions that get a guy like me that doesnt know much very confused.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this