Jump to content



Recommended Posts

I sent a validation notice to CA requesting validation of debt. I requested name and address of original creditor, amount of alleged debt, date alleged debt became payable, date of original delinquency, etc. The response I received goes as follows, Account number, OC, account balance and the following statement. "You have previously submitted the same dispute ( either directly to us or indirectly through a Credit Reporting Agency) and we have already fulfilled our duties with respect to your dispute under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, section 623 (a) (8). Therefore a reinvestigation is not required. We do hereby provide the following statement to comply with applicable statues: This communication is from a debt collector. This is an attemp to collect a debt and any information obtained will be used for that purpose".

I would like to send another letter of validation using Coppola v. Arrow Financial Services, 302CV577, 2002 WL 32173704 (D.Conn., Oct. 29, 2002). Would this be advisable or should I just send a second validation letter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.