Jump to content

Past the 30 day dispute period


shelms5
 Share

Recommended Posts

I am new to this and just have a few questions. I am trying to clean up my CR and have submitted a few DV letters to CA's. I got a reply from one (asset acceptance) it was just a statement and not a payment history. The others I havn't heard from and doubt I will due to the fact that I am past the 30 day dispute period. How do I proceed to remove these debts from my CR if the CA ignores me?

#2 I also disputed some accounts with the CRA. They came back as verified. I then called the OC and was told by HSBC that they did not have the payment history,that I needed to call the CA. I was then told by First Premier that all they had in the form of records would be copies of the billing statements and that I would be charged $3 per statement for these. I in turn called the CRA and gave then the name and number of the individuals I spoke with. They re-opened a dispute but acted like it was a waste of time. What is the next stepi f these come back again as verified?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember that CA's do not have to respond to your DV. :( If you dispute with the CRA's, the debt is yours and within the SOL, be prepared to possibly have to pay for them. :twisted: You need to have a current copy of your credit reports so that you know who actually owns the accounts. Also remember whenever the CRA's verify, you have the right to ask them their MOV, method of verification...the who, when, where of how it was verified. There is a letter on this forum for such a purpose. If they verified, make them tell you how they did it! :boxing: We here on the forum try to stay off the phone as it's more vital that you have a paper trail. xpopcornx This is why most of our correspondence is by certified mail. :)++

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you should read this. It will help you with the OC. Especially the one's that don't have records. http://creditinfocenter.com/repair/DisputingWithOriginalCreditor.shtml

If you can't get the CA's to verify to you and they're not marking your CR as disputed, they're in violation. The only thing required by FCRA, outside the 30 day window, is that they mark your CR in dispute. If not, violation. If they do that after 2 disputes, send them an ITS letter. Tell them if they don't validate w/you, and verify the TL, they are in violation and you will seek a lawyer. If that doesn't work, which some CAs don't care about lawsuit, one being ASSet, you will have to follow through and sue to have them removed. BTW, welcome.:)++

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ya just sol (the outta luck one) if they mark it in dispute and never verify? Arrow and Lvnv did that to me. They are listed under open accounts (just disputed that, those butt holes should be listed under collections) and of course 120+ late. I tried the 1, 2 punch.. and that is how it ended. Verified, 120+ past due and listed in open accounts. oddly, thats where I started.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You just have to keep after it. Sometimes it almost seems like a game to see who can pester who the most, if your getting the best of them, it won't take long before they quit verifying, but, as I've found through experiance, threatening to file law suit doesn't scare them at all, however, receiving summons papers does. So if all else fails, once you get enough violations to make a good solid case against them, just pay the little bit of money it takes and file suit.. It's MUCH easier than you think.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

at this point do I have them on anything to sue? They are listed as a open installment account on EQ:

AFS ASSIG-****

Condition: Open

Balance: $1956

Type: Unknown - credit extension, review, or collection

Pay Status: Late 120 Days

and

CITIFIN-****

Condition: Open

Balance: $6231

Type: Unknown - credit extension, review, or collection

Pay Status: Late 120 Days

On EX and TU

Creditor Name: ARROW FINCL ARROW FINANCIAL SERVIC

- Account No.: listed listed

- Original Creditor: AFS ASSIGNEE OF PROVIDIAN NATI

- Responsibility: Individual Individual

- Condition: Derogatory Derogatory

- Original Balance: $1094 $1094

- Balance: $1956 $1956

- Date Opened: 03/07/2002 03/2002

- Date Reported: 03/01/2007 03/01/2007

Looks like they have it correct on TU and EX however, the date opened is later than I think it should be.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.