nascar Posted July 14, 2007 Report Share Posted July 14, 2007 This will require some reading;In addressing a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12((6), the Court must follow the new standard of review articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombley, 127 S.Ct 1955 (May 21, 2007). The Supreme Court determined that the standard set forth in Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S 41, 45-46 (1957), “that a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of [her] claim which would entitle [her] to relief[,]” has “earned its retirement.” Twombly, 127 S.Ct at 1968, 1969. The Supreme Court held that a viable complaint must now include “enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” Id. at 1974. That is, “[f]actual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level....” Id. at 1965. The new standard is not a “heightened fact pleading” requirement, but “simply calls for enough fact to raise a reasonable expectation that discovery will reveal evidence of [the claim].” Id. at 1965, 1974. Hogue v. Palisades Collection, LLC, Slip Copy 2007 WL 1892938 (S.D.Iowa, 2007). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
divemedic Posted July 14, 2007 Report Share Posted July 14, 2007 Wow. That sucks. I am not liking this court at all.http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/06pdf/06-278.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IHateCAs Posted July 14, 2007 Report Share Posted July 14, 2007 My first reaction is I see no problem with this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
girlfromga Posted July 14, 2007 Report Share Posted July 14, 2007 I'm blonde I don't get it could someone translate in regular people talk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
divemedic Posted July 14, 2007 Report Share Posted July 14, 2007 What it means is that a JDB can sue you, and immediately file for MSJ under the rules of procedure. The bar to obtain a summary judgment in fed court is now much lower. It seems to me that the first party to file the MSJ/MSD is the winner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
girlfromga Posted July 14, 2007 Report Share Posted July 14, 2007 That is what Fred Hanna did to me it was like being hit by a truck. I got served and before I got a court date they had applied for the summary judgement. Which they won. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nascar Posted July 15, 2007 Author Report Share Posted July 15, 2007 My first reaction is I see no problem with this.I believe this will result in more dismissals for weakly formulated complaints. All things considered, this may be a good thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts