Jump to content

My NAF junk


Recommended Posts

On May 24, my attorney filed the response to the NAF claim W&A had filed against me. He requested an in-person hearing, stated that the SOL has expired, etc. He called me a couple of weeks ago and said he recieved a notice from NAF saying they had entered an award against me. Shortly after he filed the response, he got a letter from them saying it was too soon to file the response and we needed to wait until proof of service had been given to them by W&A. Neither of us heard anything else from anybody until this notice of the award.

He told me he'd write them a letter saying we would file a motion to vacate the award, they never contacted either of us until the notice of the award.

Today I got a letter from W&A, telling me the NAF had issued the award against me, and telling me to contact their office to resolve it. The, of course they threaten to "evaluate" my account for judicial enforcement.

I'll sedn a copy of this to my attorney and see what he thinks we should do about it. Any ideas or comments here are welcome.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

wait to see what your lawyer does.. I know you had followed my case as well.. we were supposed to have an in person hearing but they did a preliminary one and as you can see by my post it went better then expected.

You really cant do anything until you talk to your lawyer.. what I dont understand is why this came to you?? My lawyers got all of the NAF and collectors letters nothing came to me after I hired him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems you could also attack NAF directly over this. You requested an in-person hearing, provided for under thier own rules.

What happened with that? They just summarily blew youo off? That's a violation of your right to due process. So NAF itself and the arbitor in particular would both be targets of a civil rights violation case.

They cannot engage in actions that would be binding as a court and NOT provide you with the due process rights your are entitled to under the constitution. private operation or not.

When are these NAF cocksuckers gonna get RICO'd for these actions against thousands of consumers a year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems you could also attack NAF directly over this. You requested an in-person hearing, provided for under thier own rules with that? They just summarily blew youo off? That's a violation of your right to due process. So NAF itself and the arbitor in particular would both be targets of a civil rights violation case.

They cannot engage in actions that would be binding as a court and NOT provide you with the due process rights your are entitled to under the constitution. private operation or not.

When are these NAF cocksuckers gonna get RICO'd for these actions against thousands of consumers a year.

Thais nice in theory but anyone including lawyer will tell you NAF does not have to play by the courts rules they seem to have a set of their own .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.