EdwinRamos Posted September 9, 2007 Report Share Posted September 9, 2007 Just ran into this article, what amazed me is the mention of calls being received by a debtor, and the answer the CA replied with, "The company responded to his complaint by writing that it attempted to call him "no more than four times a day" and that federal law only addresses actual contacts with a consumer and not attempts. entire article can be seen here http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/328406_debt21.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clove610 Posted September 9, 2007 Report Share Posted September 9, 2007 Thanks for the link. It was informative and just reiterates what is in this forum. You must educate yourself. We have more rights than most of us are aware of. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iffaj98 Posted September 9, 2007 Report Share Posted September 9, 2007 that is a great articlE! I find it quite amusing how they get EVERYTHING to work in their FAVOR8-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
divemedic Posted September 9, 2007 Report Share Posted September 9, 2007 They are wrong wbout that.(5) Causing a telephone to ring or engaging any person in telephone conversation repeatedly or continuously with intent to annoy, abuse, or harass any person at the called number. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts