stymie Posted June 30, 2008 Report Share Posted June 30, 2008 Doing a Ch-13 and lawyer says he gets $2500 up front and then puts a claim in for another $2500 with trustee. Does this sound legit? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jq26 Posted July 1, 2008 Report Share Posted July 1, 2008 That sounds steep. Although with 13s there can be so many side issues that a complicated case can be very expensive. I would think for a SIMPLE 13 that $2500 total would be sufficient. I read a case last week that was issued by a 3rd circuit BK judge that denied a well-known attorney's Chap13 claim for payment as an administrative expense (this can be done through the court if the payment isn't made upfront). The attorney was asking for $28,000. But here's the kicker: it wasn't the AMOUNT that was the sticking point. It was that the attorney secured a $28,000 mortgage against the debtor's property ahead of time without the court's permission (presumably to assure payment ). That's a huge no-no as Judge Frank (3rd Cir) explained in his opinion. My point in posting that was that some attorneys are apparently charging $28,000 for very, very complicated 13 cases where there are family partnerships and other issues involved. But I would think that $2500 is probably the going rate for a simple 13. Shop around if you aren't happy. Good luck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
parsoc Posted July 1, 2008 Report Share Posted July 1, 2008 Our attorney is charging $3500 also, $1800 was upfront and covered all the filing fees. Considering that he's going to be involved for the next 5 years with various issues coming up it didn't seem that expensive. Cases that look simple at the beginning have the potential to fall apart or get more complicated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts