Jump to content

A CA "Plaza/TR2" gave me a hard INQ.


Recommended Posts

Who is PLAZA/TR2?

I have a hard INQ from Plaza/TR2 who are obviously some collection agency. This happened recently. I have not heard from them by mail ect. and it has been a few weeks now.

When I did a search for them I found this from someone who also had a hard inquiry from them....

"I would send an ITS letter to Plaza stating their willful violation of FCRA Section 604 ©(1)(A).

Since there is no contest their inquiry is in the section that shows to others, one should ask $1,000 to be paid within 30 days.

One can also send a letter to the CRA notifying them of no-PP for that inquiry and requesting an investigation - after 30dd of no action from the CRA, send ITS letter for willful violation of Section 604 ©(3). "

Okay update I found out who they are:

Plaza Associates

http://www.plazaassociates.com/affiliations.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

send them a simple letter asking them why they think they had a PP for pulling your credit.

dont quote any law just yet. give them a chance to respond (send it CMRR). If they dont respond, or give you a bull**** answer, then send them a "more firm" *(read: borderline intent to sue)* letter.

start the paper trail.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you think about mentioning the 604 like the post I found on the internet.

I can see where someone could interpret that to mean a CA cannot pull your CR without your permission, however, the "not initiated by the consumer" part refers back to the original credit transaction, not the subsequent collection activity.

And in terms of credit, the request for credit is initiated by the consumer. Remember, an invitation to apply for a credit card is not - in terms of contract law - an offer to extend credit.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can see where someone could interpret that to mean a CA cannot pull your CR without your permission, however, the "not initiated by the consumer" part refers back to the original credit transaction, not the subsequent collection activity.

Are you sure? The Pintos case directly stated that the CA had no PP unless the original credit transaction was initiated by the consumer, in her case it was a towing company. If you never gave T-mobile permission to pull your credit, or you never had an account with T-mobile, then that CA never had a PP pull your report.

Also, should they chose to pull your report, it should not be classified as a "hard pull", it should be a account review, so it doesnt affect your credit score.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are you sure? The Pintos case directly stated that the CA had no PP unless the original credit transaction was initiated by the consumer, in her case it was a towing company

The issue in Pintos was that there was never an extension of credit to begin with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So can the collection agency pull a hard iquiry on your credit report?

I thought this whole time the CA's can only soft pull. That is what the CA's have done in the past on my credit reports.

the way I intererpert (god i cant spell) it is that if the original transaction was credit related (ie: credit card, loan, mortgage, etc...) then the CA assumes the same rights as the OC, so they can pull your credit.

For other things...tow bills, magazine subscriptions, etc, then I would not think a CA has any right to pull your credit report.

but..there is not sufficient case law (yet) on this. who wants to be the first :)++

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am of the same interpretation, Focus.

Regarding hard/soft inqs though that Fairy brought up...since your signing of a cell phone contract entails them (Tmobile or whomever) to check your credit, then I think it'll be awful hard to prove a hard pull is illegal.

Now if they KEEP doing hard pulls, then that's a bit of a different story :-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding hard/soft inqs though that Fairy brought up...since your signing of a cell phone contract entails them (Tmobile or whomever) to check your credit, then I think it'll be awful hard to prove a hard pull is illegal.

that is, assuming of course, that she actually had an account with Tmobile.

if she didnt, and it was truely a mistaken identity, then they had no right to come anywhere near her reports.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have only had 2 CA's make hard pulls, and a bunch make soft pulls on my wifes report.

both of the companies that did the hard pulls went away after a nice ITS letter with a draft copy of my complaint. I am still thinking of filing the complaints......I have another 4 or so months to do so, as they never gave me what I was asking for, they just "closed my file" and took off the item off my report.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have only had 2 CA's make hard pulls, and a bunch make soft pulls on my wifes report.

both of the companies that did the hard pulls went away after a nice ITS letter with a draft copy of my complaint. I am still thinking of filing the complaints......I have another 4 or so months to do so, as they never gave me what I was asking for, they just "closed my file" and took off the item off my report.

LOVE IT!:p

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plaza will go away quickly with a DV, or at least in my case they did. They were collecting for WFNNB in my case. Once they sent initial dunning letter, I DV'd and they went away. They never showed up on my credit report. As far as CA's and INQ's, I have never had a "hard" inq from any of the CA's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.