Jump to content

I think they have been re-aged, but can't prove


madmader
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hello everyone:

I have a few collections, that were for services performed in 2003, & 2004. I have no way of proving these dates though. I am almost positive that these accounts have been suffled thru three different CA's and I think they have been re-aged. I have disputed them, and they came back as to fall off my report in 2014. 7.5 years prior would put them created in 2006, but I know that is not the case...

What can I do? I do not have the original bills from the hospital to prove the re-aging. Should I contact the OC?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, I don't have the answer, in fact, I am in the same boat, so maybe we can kill two birds with one stone here. I would like to post my problem here two. Maybe both of us can get an answer here from those in the know.

My problem is I had an Ex make off with an RV during our divorce in 2008. The OC keeps posting it as of Dec. of each coming year. i.e 12-08 then 12-09 then 12-10. I presume they are re-aging it on me. in TX the SOL is 4 years and I have a year to go. The last payment was made about May of 08.

She had the RV in pocession, so the court gave it to her, she later defaulted on it, but it was a joint account and I have deeper pockets. I tried to copy my CR to post here, but its a little flakey. Hopefully it can be understood.

My question too, is, am I being reaged?

Thanks, Tom

Equifax

Experian

TransUnion

Reported Reported Reported GEMB/FUNANCING - Secured Loan

INSTALLMENT INSTALLMENT INSTALLMENT Account Number xxxx201

1201 Ownership Co-signer Joint

Date Open 07-2005

07-2005

07-2005

Balance Date 12-2010

12-2010

12-2010

Balance Amount $31762

$31762 Monthly

Payment High/Limit $53359

Account Status Contact member for status Unpaid balance

reported as a loss by credit grantor Charged off as bad debt

Prior Delinquency 12-2010

Past Due Amount $0 Equifax [Comment: Secured]

Experian [Comment: Closed - Special handling-Contact

subscriber for additional information]

TransUnion [Comment: Contact subscriber]

What are they saying, contact the OC for futher info above?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello everyone:

I have a few collections, that were for services performed in 2003, & 2004. I have no way of proving these dates though. I am almost positive that these accounts have been suffled thru three different CA's and I think they have been re-aged. I have disputed them, and they came back as to fall off my report in 2014. 7.5 years prior would put them created in 2006, but I know that is not the case...

What can I do? I do not have the original bills from the hospital to prove the re-aging. Should I contact the OC?

When was the last time you paid on these accounts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My problem is I had an Ex make off with an RV during our divorce in 2008. The OC keeps posting it as of Dec. of each coming year. i.e 12-08 then 12-09 then 12-10. I presume they are re-aging it on me. in TX the SOL is 4 years and I have a year to go. The last payment was made about May of 08.

When you say the "OC keeps posting as of Dec., etc"...are you referring to the "date reported"? If so, that's simply the date they are reporting the status to the CRA.

The 4 year SOL to which you're referring is the SOL for collections. The SOL for reporting negative accounts to credit reporting agencies is 7 years. Since the last payment was made in May/2008, the entry should fall off your credit report somewhere between June to November of 2015.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't given them a dime. They actually called me last night because I went on all three of the CRA's and disputed the date they were reporting. After speaking with the CA, they proved to me that I was actually in the wrong. I was getting accounts messed up. The account I thought this was, actually expired last year. They are sending me a detailed list of the bills they have, the original date of service, etc...

Thanks for your help

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BV80, thanks for the help on mine. From doing the research on here, I knew the difference on the SOL for being reported and the SOL to be sued. This is what I am talking about: Balance Date 12-2010. If you will look at the three bureaus reporting above, you might be able to see what I am talking about. It was hard to copy all three at once over.

I really like this site a lot of help. Excuse my typing, I am a one handed dis-abled vet.

Tom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

TomnTex,

It's difficult to say without seeing the report, but it could mean as of 12/2010, the balance was being report as $31,762.00. If it was being reaged, the date of the first major delinquency would have been changed to reflect a more recent date.

I'm not sure what they mean about "prior delinquency". I haven't seen that on my CRs. Did they include a charge-off date anywhere?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks BV80, what I posted was the report off all three of my CR's. I get a three in one report. I know that it was early 2008 that the last payment was made, like about April or May.

After that, it would show Balance Date 12-2008, 12-2009, then 2010. To me, it looked like they were re-aging it. Sure hard to tell. I only have another year for the TX SOL to run out. I am lucky though. I am buying a house and the bank ignored this with a divorce decree showing that the debt, even though joint, belonged to her. Maybe others might have an idea of whats going on. I do appreciate your input. I've been reading on here for several weeks and have learned a lot.

Tom

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.