Jump to content

want a copy of Midand Funding robo signed affidavit


Recommended Posts

While I would like to get a copy of the Midland Affidavit, a couple from another CA or used by CAP 1 that shows the switching around of signors would be interesting and possibly helpful too.

I'm contesting the affidavit used as evidence as being false among other things

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sorry if this is slightly off topic, but if Midland has been sued for robo-signing, what prevents Midland defendants from pulling those suits and making the same claims as counterclaims in the individual collection actions Midland brings? This might be a way to force this in front of judges.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sorry if this is slightly off topic, but if Midland has been sued for robo-signing, what prevents Midland defendants from pulling those suits and making the same claims as counterclaims in the individual collection actions Midland brings? This might be a way to force this in front of judges.

The process that all of these affidavits go by is suspect, printed off in stacks of hundreds and signed without review

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First off, this is a case by and in the State of Minnesota. You can bring this up in a case in another state but the judge is not bound by that action at all. Also, realize that Midland is only accused and has not been convicted yet. The law of the land is still innocent until proven guilty.

Now, in the State of Minnesota, you could file a motion for continuance saying that your case cannot go on until the issue is resolved in the case of Minnesota v Midland. Realize though that as long as your case stays open, the SOL it tolled until there is a resolution. Midland could dismiss w/o prejudice but then they would have to hope the situation is resolved before the SOL runs out (or could simply sell it to someone who is not in the same position they are and can sue you).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First off, this is a case by and in the State of Minnesota. You can bring this up in a case in another state but the judge is not bound by that action at all. Also, realize that Midland is only accused and has not been convicted yet. The law of the land is still innocent until proven guilty.

Now, in the State of Minnesota, you could file a motion for continuance saying that your case cannot go on until the issue is resolved in the case of Minnesota v Midland. Realize though that as long as your case stays open, the SOL it tolled until there is a resolution. Midland could dismiss w/o prejudice but then they would have to hope the situation is resolved before the SOL runs out (or could simply sell it to someone who is not in the same position they are and can sue you).

I want to be able to compare it to the affidavit I received, I have issues about the one I was sent as it is an obvious template where only fields like name amount owed and account number are replaced. I have a second copy of that one. Whats to say someone can't use the same logic from the Minnesota case? I am a collector and now I'm collecting documents and opinions from Collection Lawsuits, never know what might be helpful.

As soon as I can get a break for a few weeks I'm going to start calling and see if I can get copies of some of the dcuments and such used in landmark cases, Opinions are wonderful but I want t look at the mechanics of some of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Judge Katz is certainly on to them in Ohio. Encore employees determined the validity of a debt "based entirely" on a printout. In the same instant case, a Midland employee testified in a deposition that he signs 200 to 400 affidavits a day, few of which are reviewed for accuracy. Judge Katz ruled that the company violated U.S. and state laws by trying to recoup soured credit-card debt using a fraudulent affidavit. My experience is that they are all fraudulent. Further, one "affiant" allegedly signed an affidavit every 13 seconds during her daily work period.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...
While I would like to get a copy of the Midland Affidavit, a couple from another CA or used by CAP 1 that shows the switching around of signors would be interesting and possibly helpful too.

I'm contesting the affidavit used as evidence as being false among other things

I found a PDF case in AK, in which the affiant on the Affidavit is the Notary on mine. That one was dated September of 2010, mine (not scanned so I can't send that one) is dated December 2010. In other words just the switching you are speaking of. I'm not allowed to post a link so look up Capital One vs Vaughan in Ark. One attorney listed is Donal C. Tippett

On page 6 Margaret Parton is the affiant, on my affidavit she is the Notary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sorry if this is slightly off topic, but if Midland has been sued for robo-signing, what prevents Midland defendants from pulling those suits and making the same claims as counterclaims in the individual collection actions Midland brings? This might be a way to force this in front of judges.

Right now Judge David Katz has it stopped until Midland v. Brent is final. If a person wishes to preserve a claim I hope they had the sense to opt out of the law suit as a class member.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.