Jump to content

Nearly Cleared up


crash5050
 Share

Recommended Posts

I have all but one negative removed from mBig 3 creidt reports, but I hav eone little poodunk collection agency refusing to wrok with me. The have me marked as KD in April of 2011 and showing the account opened in July of 2001. I think that would fall under both re-aging and false reporting. Should I Sue?

David

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say that you have to make sure every proofs you have should be accurate or else they would have a ground to sue you in return. Perhaps, it's better to hear a couple of advice from experts first or from consultation firm before finally deciding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have all but one negative removed from mBig 3 creidt reports, but I hav eone little poodunk collection agency refusing to wrok with me. The have me marked as KD in April of 2011 and showing the account opened in July of 2001. I think that would fall under both re-aging and false reporting. Should I Sue?

David

I assume you've already disputed the entry with the CRAs. Is the OC still reporting? If so, what does their entry state? Also, is the CA reporting a date of first delinquency?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with BV80.;) Many people confuse the "date of last activity" with the "date of first delinquency"....the prior one could be any date that "any" activity was done on your account. Don't let them fool you into thinking the account is newer than it is with this language. :censored: If they do indeed "re-age" your account, go after them!::BigGun::

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.