Jump to content

Judgment without being served


let_it_slide
 Share

Recommended Posts

My sister was sent to court against Capital One in October in Maryland. She went to file for arbitration and the court granted her 60 days to file for arbitration. She filed for arbitration within the deadline of 60 days and it's currently being set up with JAMS. However the court apparently issued a judgment against her for the full amount just a few days ago, even though she was never sent a notice to appear in court. She checked the court site and it doesn't even list her in the roster for appearances.

Is there anything she can do now? She was in the process of setting up the arbitration but JAMS needed more information and Capital One was fighting it with ill intent (they were blatantly lying).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Motion to vacate the judgment and attach the order of the court granting you 60 days to file with JAMS along with the proof arbitration was filed within 60 days. That should be a pretty easy judgment to vacate.

If there was some "confusion" and other info needed and she did not actually file the arbitration, might be a problem. It is a common trick to delay and delay while waiting on a deadline to pass and then going for the kill.

It's most common with creditors being over the top friendly after a suit has been filed, promising the moon to the debtor. Then when the debtor takes them at their word and the time to answer the suit has passed, the creditor files for a default and the creditor turns into Satan overnight.

In other words, delay and stall until what is unfavorable to you has passed the time. You have to stay on top of this and move for extension or at least do all you can on your end.

Edited by Coltfan1972
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok. She has proof that the JAMS arbitration letters were sent out within 60 days, so I will have her send that info to the court and set a motion to vacate. She is still trying to proceed with JAMS though Cap1 has decided to lie about the terms of arbitration and it caused a hold-up beyond the 60 days, but that was out of her control so I hope it won't count against her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.