Jump to content

COllection Activities after SOL has past


Recommended Posts

I guess the question is "What defines collection activities?" Obviously phone calls, letters etc,. but what about reporting negative to the CRA's. I understand that a negative Item may be reported to the CRA for 7.5 years, however, couldn't one argue that by reporting negative information be considered a collection activity. I seem to remember an FTC opinion letter but I cannot find it anywhere.

David

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it 7 years past date of last activity? IF so, then the account should not be reporting on your credit report.

If not, then I would send them a debt validation letter and remind them that they are past the statute of limitations. If that gets them nothing, I would send a letter to your state AG's office and cc them on the letter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sent a followup letter with this in it. I hope they ignore it too, then we are off to court.

The Rules of Civil Procedure of the State of Arkansas provide a Statute Of Limitations limiting the time frame for any legal collection activities.

Under (A.C.A. §16-56-106) , the subject account has a 2 year limit for filing any legal action for collection of Medical Related Debts.

Under the Arkansas (A.C.A. §16-56-106) continued collection activities, including reporting, verification or reinsertion of accounts. beyond their legal collection date to any consumer credit reporting agency, may be considered extortion and/or fraud and subject to criminal as well as civil prosecution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is, CR reporting has a different SOL than the state SOL for using the legal system to collect on a debt. They can also say that as long as they the credit report is reporting accurately what happened, that is not a collection activity. The collector can simply say that in the instance of reporting, federal SOL trumps the state law.

Finally, passing the legal SOL does not mean that a collector cannot call you and ask you to pay a debt. In many states now, they have to tell you that the debt is out of SOL. Of course, you can laugh in their face and tell them where they can shove that debt too if the SOL has expired.

I think you are on shaky ground but that is my opinion and you can take it for what it is worth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is, CR reporting has a different SOL than the state SOL for using the legal system to collect on a debt. They can also say that as long as they the credit report is reporting accurately what happened, that is not a collection activity. The collector can simply say that in the instance of reporting, federal SOL trumps the state law.

Finally, passing the legal SOL does not mean that a collector cannot call you and ask you to pay a debt. In many states now, they have to tell you that the debt is out of SOL. Of course, you can laugh in their face and tell them where they can shove that debt too if the SOL has expired.

I think you are on shaky ground but that is my opinion and you can take it for what it is worth.

I would think that since this is an Arkansas Collection Agency, they would fall under Arkansas Rules.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree, AR law should apply. I assume the hospital where the debt occurred is in AR, so is the collection agency, so AR SOL should apply as this is the "forum state." Coltfan will know, insurance was his field and he is from your state. I think collection activity is defined in the FDCPA statute.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.