jjrober Posted February 16, 2012 Report Share Posted February 16, 2012 Im currently dealing with a debt lawsuit with a firm guglielmo & associates i already answered their summons denying their accusations and i sent my request for documents interrogates an request for admissions.. They claim they are the attorneys for discover bank but no documentation has been provided to prove such..Anyhow I got an appointment for mediation with the judge.. the attorneys requested that they meet without the plaintiff discover bank...Should I object to the judge since no proof of assignment for contract have been provided? I want the alleged creditor there unless the acting attorneycan provide proof of 3rd party authorization!.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BV80 Posted February 16, 2012 Report Share Posted February 16, 2012 If Discover is named as the Plaintiff, the court accepts that as fact. Attorneys don't usually have to present proof that a cc company hired them, nor is anyone from the cc company usually present at a hearing. I suppose you'd have to convince the judge that the law firm may not be telling the truth.If you're thinking that they may be representing a JDB instead, check Discover's entry on your credit report. If the entry doesn't state sold or transferred, then Discover still owns the account. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts